Itta/195/2003 Of Reddy Satyavathi v. Income Tax Officer,Ward-I
High Court
17 Sep 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/195/2003 Of Reddy Satyavathi v. Income Tax Officer,Ward-I
Date of order
17 Sep 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Itta/195/2003 Of Reddy Satyavathi v. Income Tax Officer,Ward-I, the High Court (2014) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Following the same, we allow the appeal and set aside theorder dated 19-04-2002 passed by the Tribunal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDYANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
I.T.T.A No. 195 OF 2003
17-09-2014
BETWEEN
Reddy Satyavathi, Nidadavolu
…Appellant
And
Income Tax Officer, Ward-I, Tanuku
…..Respondent
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDYAND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
I.T.T.A No. 195 OF 2003
JUDGMENT:(per the Hon'ble Sri Justice L. Narasimha Reddy)
This appeal is preferred by the assessee against the order,dated 19-04-2002, passed by the Visakhapatnam Bench of theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short, ‘the Tribunal’) in ITANo.1667/Hyd/1996.
The learned counsel for the appellant and the learnedcounsel for the respondent submit that the subject matter of thisappeal is covered by a judgment of this Court in ITTA No. 54 of2003 and batch, dated 02-09-2014.
Following the same, we allow the appeal and set aside theorder dated 19-04-2002 passed by the Tribunal. There shall be noorder as to costs.
___________________________
L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J
17-09-2014ks
____________________________
CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue