Case LawHigh Court › Itta/196/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itta/196/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) v. Oil Country Tubular Ltd

High Court 29 Feb 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/196/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) v. Oil Country Tubular Ltd
Date of order
29 Feb 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itta/196/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) v. Oil Country Tubular Ltd, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Permission is accorded and the appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHANANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHYI.T.T.A.No.196 of 2011 ORDER:(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan) Sri J.V.Prasad, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the IncomeTax Department, would submit that in terms of CBDT Circular No.21 of2015 dated 10.12.2015, all appeals, where the tax effect is belowRs.20,00,000/-, are required to be withdrawn and, as the value of thepresent appeal is less than Rs.20,00,000/-, the appellant may bepermitted to withdraw the appeal. Permission is accorded and the appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn. The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall alsostand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J Date: 29.02.2016 v v ___________________________________ M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan