Case LawHigh Court › Itta/198/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Itta/198/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. M/S Keerthi Estates Pvt Ltd

High Court 19 Mar 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/198/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. M/S Keerthi Estates Pvt Ltd
Date of order
19 Mar 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/198/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. M/S Keerthi Estates Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: We record that against theoriginal order, which was sought to be rectified, is not challenged.Hence, we dismiss this appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A.No.198 of 2014 Date: 19-03-2014 Between: Commissioner of Income Tax-IIHyderabad .....Appellant AND M/s Keerthi Estates Pvt. Ltd.,Hyderabad. ...Respondent HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A.No.198 of 2014 JUDGMENT:(per Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta ) We have gone through the impugned judgment and order ofthe learned Tribunal and have heard Mr.S.R.Ashok, learnedCounsel for the appellant. It appears that by the impugned order, the learned Tribunalhas merely corrected some mistake, namely, by way of deletingsome irrelevant and unwarranted observations. The relief grantedby the original order was not touched. We record that against theoriginal order, which was sought to be rectified, is not challenged.Hence, we dismiss this appeal. No order as to costs. ___________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ __________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J 19-03-2014 Gsn
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan