Itta/201/2014 Of The Commr Of Income Tax I, Hyderabad v. Ayyappa Infra Projects Pvt Ltd., Hyderabad
High Court
18 Mar 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/201/2014 Of The Commr Of Income Tax I, Hyderabad v. Ayyappa Infra Projects Pvt Ltd., Hyderabad
Date of order
18 Mar 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/201/2014 Of The Commr Of Income Tax I, Hyderabad v. Ayyappa Infra Projects Pvt Ltd., Hyderabad, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
134471
IN THE HIGH COURTFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAYOF MARCHTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHYANDTHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDAINCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEALO:201 OF 2O'14OF 2O'142O'14
O:201 OF 2O'14OF 2O'142O'14
Appeal filed under section 60 A of the rncorne Tax Act-l961 against orderdated.30-08-2013 in rrA No.1932tHydt2010 for A.y. 2oog-to on the fire of thelncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench [,A, ]Hyderabad.
Between
The Commissioner of lncome Tax l, Hyderabad
...AppellanURespondent
ANDAyyappa lnfra Projects Pvt Ltd.,Flat No.306, Om Sai Nilayam St., No.8,Habsiguda, Hyderabad....RespondenUAppellant
Counsel for the Appellant: Ms. B. Sapna Reddy, Junior Standing Counselrepresenting Mr. J.V. Prasad (Senior Standing Counsel for lncome Tax)Counsel for the Respondent: Sri Ch. pushyam KiranThe Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
TIIE HONOURABLE [P.SAM ] ANDTIIE HONOURABLE NANDIKONDA
ITTA No.2[01 ]0F [2014]
Jt,DGMENT[(per ][Hon'ble ][Sri ][Justice ][P.Sam ][Koshy)]
Heard Ms. [B.Sapna ][Reddy, ][leamed ][Junior ][Standing]Counsel representing [Mr' ][J.V'Prasad, ][leamed Senior ][Standing]iounsel for [the ][Income Tax Department ][lor ][the ][appellant' ][Perused]the record.
2This appeat [under Section ][260,4. ][of ][the Income ][Tax Act']1961, has [been preferred ][by ][the ][Revenue ][as ][the ][appellant]the [order ][dated ][30'08 ][2013 ][passed ][by ][the ][Income ][Tax]against Appellate Tribunal, [Hyderabad ][Bench ]['A" ][Hyderabad' ][in]I.T.A.No.1832 [ft1ydl20l2 ][fbr ][the ][Asscssment ][Year 2009-10']
3. Central Board [ol ][Direct ][Taxes ][(CBDT) ][has issued ][Circular]No.9 of 2024 [dated ][17.09.2024, ][amending ][the ][previous Circular]No.5of2024datedl5.03.2024,byturtherenhancingthemonetarylimits for [frling ][appeals ][by ][the ][lncorne ][Tax ][Department before ][the]Income [Tax Appellate ][l'ribunals, ][High ][Courts and ][Supreme ][Court]
f(
as a measure for reducing litigation. In paragraph 2 of the saidCircular, we find that the monetary limit fixed for filing an appealbefore the High Court is Rs.2.00 crore.Circular, we find that the monetary limit fixed for filing an appealbefore the High Court is Rs.2.00 crore.
4In the instant appeal, tax effect is well below the monetarylimit.limit.
5. Therefore, the appeal filed by the Depaxtment is dismissed interms of the aforesaid Circular No.9 of 2024 dated l7.Og.2I24t.However, if the appeal comes within the exception of CircularNo.5 of 2024, i would be open to the Income Tax Department toseek revival olthe appeal. There shall be no order as to costs.
6. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall
stand closed
. K. SRINIVASA RAO. SECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
To,4. 2. 3 'l . One CC to Sri Ch. The One CC lwo CD Copieslncome to Mr. Tax J.V. prasad Appellate pushyam (Senior Tribunal, Kiran, Advocat"e6trnAingHyderaCounselbad loPUclBench 'A' for lncome Tax)[OpUC]Hyderabad.
Kam/PSL
t/
HIGH COURT
DATED:1810312025
JUDGMENTlTTA.No.201 of 2014
DISMISSING OFTHE APPEAL2I/././
i\,<ck-'1rcri, )1I TUE MI* D6Sl,nr l rrlt^;.--
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.