Itta/201/2017 Of Prl Commr Of Income Tax-2, Hyderabad v. M/S Ijm [India] Infrastructure Ltd., Hyderabad
High Court
19 Jul 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/201/2017 Of Prl Commr Of Income Tax-2, Hyderabad v. M/S Ijm [India] Infrastructure Ltd., Hyderabad
Date of order
19 Jul 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/201/2017 Of Prl Commr Of Income Tax-2, Hyderabad v. M/S Ijm [India] Infrastructure Ltd., Hyderabad, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, in this Appeal shall also stand dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE NINETEENTH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE [M.S.RAMACHANDRA ] ANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE [T.VINOD KUMAR]INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL [ AL ][NO: ][201 ] [2017]
(lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under section [260 ] [of ][the ][lncome Tax ][Act,1961 ][against]the order of the [lncome Tax ][Appellate ][Tribunal, ][Hyderabad Bench ]['A ]Hyderabad in" lTANo,l4STtHydt2Ol4forAssessmentYear20l0-2011dated.24.08.2016.Between:The Principal Commissioner [of lncome Tax-2, ][Hyderabad]
...Appella nt
ANDt\,4/ UM [(lndia) ]lnfrastructure [Limited, ][1-90/A, ][Plot ][No ][20 and 21, ] [Colony']Madhadur, Hyderabad-500081,
...Respondent
Counsel for the [Appellant: ][M/s ][K. MAMATA]Counsel for the Respondent: [C. ][V. ] The Court made [the ][following: ]
I] ONOI.I II.A I}L I] RI [.I ][L] ][S1' ] [I] ][M.S. ] [I) ]
AND
HONOI,RABLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD [KUN'I,AII]
I.T.T.A. NO.20l OF 2017
JUDGME NT:
(Pet Sri Justice M.S.Rahachandra Rao)
Ms. K. Mamata Chowdary, leamed Standing Counsel [for ][Income]Tax Department has filed a letter requesting to [permit the ][appellant ][to]n,ithdrau, this Appeal on the ground that the respondent had filed anApplication unclel the'Direct'l-ax Vivad Se Vishwas Schenre, 2020 [with]libcrll' ,u lcvivc the Appeal in the evc'nt o1' lniltrre of satislirctonrcsolLrtion unrlel the saicl Schenre.
2. I Iearri the lcalned counsel 1br the Appellant and SriC.\'.\alasirnlranr. lt'arnecl counse I fbr thc rcsponclent.
3. Cranting liberty as sought. this Appeal is disnrissed as rvithdrawn.
4. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, in this Appeal shall also
stand dismissed. No costs.
SD/. B.S. JOINT REGISTRARQdSECTION
//TRUE
To,
Hyderabad
. The lncome [Tax Appellate ][Tribunal' ][Hyderabad Bench ][' ]
1
"
12. i'n" IJJiil"lricommissioner [of lncome ][Tax' ][Range-2'Hyderabad']" J. o"L cC to [M/s ][K. ][MAMATA' Advocate [oPUC] ]-^-. .46;; aa io [snr ][c v ][NARASIMHAM, Advocate ][[oPUC]]5Two CD CoPies[/lv'lK2. i'n" IJJiil"lricommissioner [of lncome ][Tax' ][Range-2'Hyderabad']" J. o"L cC to [M/s ][K. ][MAMATA' Advocate [oPUC] ]-^-. .46;; aa io [snr ][c v ][NARASIMHAM, Advocate ][[oPUC]]5Two CD CoPies[/lv'lK
HIGH MSRJ&TVKJDATED:19/07/2021
{esTArt1r7G:oLJ\0t [h1]s2t21]',* 4* D!:S pAi a,[ ]/cI
JUDGMENT|TTA.No.Z01 [ol ][2017]
DISMISSING THE [ITTA AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT ][ ]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.