Itta/205/2010 Of Infotech Enterprises Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
02 Nov 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/205/2010 Of Infotech Enterprises Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
02 Nov 2021
Assessment year(s)
1999-2000
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itta/205/2010 Of Infotech Enterprises Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT FOR THE ST
THE STAT HYDECfJiDOF
'' i%';l3t sifi S xR Sirgfi i"oJfi y,. [*]
PRESENTTHE HoNouRaeLe sir JUsircE uJJAL BHUyANrHE HoNouRABLE DR. rrtYll. .HTLLAKUR .,MALATHAINCOM ETAXTRIBU NAL APPEAL NO : 205 OF 2010
lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 260-4 of the lncome Tax Act, againstthe order of the Income Tax Appeilate Tribunar, Hyderabad Bench ,A, Hyderabad in rrANo.492lH/03 for assessment year 1999-2000 dated 2grosr2oog preferred against theOrder of the lncome Tax (Appeals)-il1, Hyderabad in tTA No.609/DCtT _2(4yCtT (A)_lll/02-03 daled 1711212002 preferred against the order of the Deputy commissioner oflncome Tax, Circle -2(4) Hyderabad in pAN/GtR No.t.79 dated 13tO3l2OO2.
Between:
lnfotech Enterl:rises Limited,42, Nagarjuna Hills, panjagutta, Hyderabad, Rep. by itsDirector, Smt B.Sucharitha...APPELLANTAND
Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax, Central Circle-S, Ayakar Bhavan, Basheerbagh,Hyderabad-500001 .
...RESPONDENT
For the Appellant : SRI S.CHAKRAPANI, LEARNED cOUNSEL FORREPRESENTING FOR SRI CHALLA GUNARANJANFor the Respondent : SMT MAMATHA SENIOR STANDING COUNSEL
The Court delivered the following: JUDGIVENT
HON()URABLE [BHUYA\]AND
HONOIIRABLE [DR.JUSTICB ][CHILLAKUR SUMAI,ATHA]
I.T.T.A No.205 OF [2010]
JIJDGMENT I [tPe ][r ][Hon'ble ][Sri.lustice ][ujjal ][Bhuyan)]
Heard Mr. S.Chakrapani, leamed counsel [representing]Mr.Challa Gunaranjan, learned counsel for the appellant andMrs.Mamatha. lear'ned Senior Standing Counsel for the Income TaxDepafiment fol the respor-rdent.
2. Learnecl counsel for the appellant subrnits that appellant hasopted for settlement under Vivad Se Vishwas scheme. Therefbre, interms of the scheme, he is required to withdraw the appeal. [{ence,the player for withdrawal of the appeal.
3. We granr liberty to the appellant to withdraw the appeal so as topursue the rem{ldy under the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.4. The appi:al is, accordingly, disposed of.5. No costs.
Sd/-K.SRINIVASA RAOJOINT REGIS{SECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY'
To1.The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ['A' ]Hyderabad2.The Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-lll, Hyderabad.1.The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ['A' ]Hyderabad2.The Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-lll, Hyderabad.
The Deputy Commrssioner of lncome Tax, Circle-2(4), Hyderabad.
3.
One CC to Sri Challa Gunaranjan, Advocate [(OPUC)]
4.
One CC to Smt l\4amatha, Senior Standing Counsel (OPUC)Two CD CopiesOne Spare CopyTwo CD CopiesOne Spare Copy
5.
6.
7.KjKj
AIY
I
DATED:0211112021
JUDGMENTITTA.No.205 ol 2010
DISPOSING OF THE ITTA ASWITHDRAWAL WITHOUT COSTS.
;{fr-ry:Jc.1$ tnrititq).1\!.i\C,
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.