Itta/205/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Vi v. M/S. Shaiko Tanners And Exporters
High Court
04 Jul 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/205/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Vi v. M/S. Shaiko Tanners And Exporters
Date of order
04 Jul 2013
Assessment year(s)
1991-1992
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/205/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Vi v. M/S. Shaiko Tanners And Exporters, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence, we dismiss the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRAPRADESH AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULYTWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICESRI KALYAN JYOTI SEN GUPTA
AND
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI
I.T.T.A. No.205 OF 2013
Between:
Commissioner of Income Tax-VIHyderabad.
..... Appellant
AND
M/s. Shaiko Tanners & Exporters,C/o: M/s. GS Madhava Rao & Company,C.As. MG Road, Warangal
.....Respondent
The Court made the following :
JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri K.J. Sengupta)
This appeal is preferred against the judgment andorder of the learned Tribunal dated 30.11.2007 in relation tothe assessment year 1991-1992. The very same judgment
was examined by a Division Bench of this Court and byjudgment and order dated 19.12.2012, the Division Benchdid not interfere with the judgment and order and dismissedthe appeal.
We respectfully agree with the decision of the DivisionBench of this Court in ITTA No. 561 of 2012 dated19.12.2012. Hence, we dismiss the appeal. Let a copy ofthe judgment and order rendered by the Division Bench inITTA No. 561 of 2012 dated 19.12.2012, be kept on record.No order as to costs.
______________________
Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, CJ.
July 04, 2013MAS
__________G.Rohini, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.