Itta/207/2015 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Singularity Software (India) Pvt Ltd
High Court
03 Apr 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/207/2015 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Singularity Software (India) Pvt Ltd
Date of order
03 Apr 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/207/2015 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Singularity Software (India) Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Therefore, the appeal filed by the Department is dismissed interms of the aforesaid Circular No.9 of 2024 dated 17.09.2024However, if the appeal comes within the exception of CircularNo.5 of 2024, it would be open to the Income Tax Department toseek revival of the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
. HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF APRILTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY&
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 207 OF 2015
Appeal under section 260 A of the lncome Tax Act, 1961, to call forrecords relating to ITA No.1BB7l\ydl2011, dated 23.11.2012 on the file of thelncome Tax Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad Bench B Hyderabad, relating to thelncome Tax Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad Bench B Hyderabad, relating to theassessment year 2005-2006 in the case of the Respondent-assessee and setaisde the order.aisde the order.
Between:
Commissioner Of lncome Tax-lll,l.T.Towers, A.C.Guards, Hyd.
AND
Singularity Software (lndia) Pvt., Ltd.,201, G.K.Classics, Srinagar Colony, Hyd,
For the Appellant . Smt. B. Swapna Reddy, rep- Mr. J.V. Prasad
Counsel for the Respondents:
The Court made the following: JUOGMENT
...Appellant
...Respondent
THE IIONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHYANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAONANDIKONDA
ITTA No.207 OF 2015
JU DGI4ENT [rper ] [lon'ble ][Sri ][Justit't' ][P.Sam ][Koshyl]
Heard Ms. B.Sapna Reddy, leamed Junior StandingCounsel [representing ][Mr. ][J.V.Prasad, learned ][Senior ][Standing]Counsel [for ][the ][Income ][Tax ][Department ][for ][thc ][appellant]Perused [the record.]2. This appeal under Section 2604, of the Incorne Tax Act,of the Incorne Tax Act,the Incorne Tax Act,Incorne Tax Act,Tax Act,1961, has [been preferred ]by the [Revenue ]as the appellantagainst the [order ]dated [23.11.2012 passed ]by the IncomeTax Appellate [Tribunal, ][Hyderabad ]Bench 'B', llyderabad,lnI.T.A.No.l887 [ft1yd/201I for ][the ]Assessment Ycar 2005-06.
This appeal under Section 2604, of the Incorne Tax Act,of the Incorne Tax Act,the Incorne Tax Act,Incorne Tax Act,Tax Act,
3. Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has issued CircularNo.9 of [2024 ][dated ][17.09.2024, ][amending ]the [previous ]CircularNo.5 of [2024 ][dated 15.03.2024, ][by further ]enhancing the monetarylimits [for ][filing ][appeals ][by ][the Income Tax Department ]before theIncome [Tax ][Appellate ][Tribunals, ]High Courts and Supreme Court
To,
as a measure for reducing litigation. ln paragraph 2 of the saidCircular, we find that the monetary limit fixed for filing an appealbefore the High Court is Rs.2.00 crore.before the High Court is Rs.2.00 crore.
4. In the instant appeal, tax effect is well below the monetarylimit.
5. Therefore, the appeal filed by the Department is dismissed interms of the aforesaid Circular No.9 of 2024 dated 17.09.2024However, if the appeal comes within the exception of CircularNo.5 of 2024, it would be open to the Income Tax Department toseek revival of the appeal. There shall be no order as to costs.
6. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shattstand closed.
SD/. K, SRINIVASA RAO
JOINT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
'1 . The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad Bench B Hyderabad2, One CC to Smt. [B. ]Swapna Reddy, for [lncome ][Tax ][Department ] 3. Two CD CoPies2, One CC to Smt. [B. ]Swapna Reddy, for [lncome ][Tax ][Department ] 3. Two CD CoPies
w
'<{
HIGH COURT
DATED.3t4t2025
JUDGMENTITTA.No.207 of 2015
APPEAL IS DISMISSED, NO COSTS
5ur?(uA\a.
\i- [s-r]4 ir- o,(JUN [206]'.2,\:-\.:
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.