Itta/209/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. M/S. Soma Enterprises Ltd
High Court
16 Jul 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/209/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. M/S. Soma Enterprises Ltd
Date of order
16 Jul 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/209/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. M/S. Soma Enterprises Ltd, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
t34471
HIGH
*,,$'3o+:,lsI-'J1',55$i,R+Y3[,J'*
PRESENT
THE [ LE ] [P'SAM ] ANDNARSING THE 010APP [ N][o:][ 209][ o] INcoM
ncomerax'1!v5'#.3::lilf m:i:ihm.lE:fnHtY'fJJffni#ll"fti{t:d'1j,;:,**
Between:
THE [TAX.III, ][HYdETAbAd.]
...APPELLANT(
AND
B-2-623t51 [1 ][t ][l,Avenue4' ][Banjarahills']M/S. Hyderabad-34.
...RESPONDENT
Counsel [for ][the APPellant:]
Counsel [for ][the ][Respondent:]
The Gourt [delivered ][the ][following:]
SMT.B.SAPNA
SRI
JUDGMENT
THEHON[,BL]ESRIJUSTICEP.KOSHYANDTHEHON'BLESRIJUSTICESINGRAONANDIKONDAINCOMETAXTRIBUNALAPPEAL NoJUDGMENT:,209OF201o@er [fton,bte ]Sn JusLtce p.SanL KoshU)
Heard Ms.B.Sapna Reddy, Iearned Sen..ror Standing Counsel Income Tax, lbrappearing on behalf of the appeliant.
2' The instant appeal under Sectio n 260Aof the Income 196 1, has been preferred Tax Act,by J the [ur! ]r\EcltRevenue as the appellant against the,rder dated 02'05'2008 passed by the Income Tax Appe,ate Tribunar,H-vderabad [,,B,, ]Bench, Hyderabad, in I.T.A.No. 16/Hyd/2OO7 for theAssessment y ear 2OO2-O3.
3' ce.tral Board of Direct raxes (CBDT) has issued circular No.9 of2024 daLed 17.og-2024, amending the previous circula;.No.5 of 2024dated 15 03' 2024, by further enhancing the rnens12ry limits for firingappeals by the Income Tax Department before the income TzrxAppe,ate Tribunals' High courts and Supreme court as a measure forreducing litigation. In paragraph 2 of the said Circular, we find thatthe monetary rimit fixed for rrling an appeal before the High court isRs.2.00 crore.
' 't.t
Page 2 [of ][3]
4. In the instant [appeal' tax ][effect ][is ][well ][below ][the ][monetary ][limit']
5. Therefore, [the ][appeal ][filed ][by ][the ][Revenue ][is ][dismissed ][in ][terms]of the [aforesaid ][Circular ][No'9 ][of ][2024 ][d'aLed' ][17 ]['Og ]['2024' ][Horvever' ][if]the appeal [comes ][within ][the ][exception ][of ][Cirbular ][No ][' ][5 ][of ][2024 ][' ][it]would be [open ][to the ][Income ][Tax Department ][to ][seek ][revival of ][the]appeal. [No ][costs']
shall6As a sequel, [miscellaneous applications ][pending ][if ][any']stand [closed.]SD'. N.
DEPUTY
Isecrrkorrrcen
//TRUE [COPY/']
To,
1. The The [lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal' Hyderabad Bench ]['8" ][Hyderabad]
1. The The 2. One [to ] [Advocate ] [t]2. One [to ] [Advocate ] [t]
3. One [to ][SRI' ] [KR|SHNAAdvocate ][ ]
4. Two [CD CoPies]
TPK/gh
Hr
illIlIllIl
HIGH COURT
DATED:16 tOTtZO2s
JUDGMENT|TTA.No.2O9 of 2O1O
ITTA tS DISMISSED
G@H-i-r\th.
ITrlE [t; ]i/icR'c-(0.0 3 sEP 206r.)/)r..
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.