Itta/209/2015 Of Prl Commr Of Income Tax [Tds] Hyderabad v. M/S Hcc-Meil-Ncc-Wpil [Jv] Hyderabad
High Court
21 Apr 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/209/2015 Of Prl Commr Of Income Tax [Tds] Hyderabad v. M/S Hcc-Meil-Ncc-Wpil [Jv] Hyderabad
Date of order
21 Apr 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/209/2015 Of Prl Commr Of Income Tax [Tds] Hyderabad v. M/S Hcc-Meil-Ncc-Wpil [Jv] Hyderabad, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Therefore, [the ][appeal ][filed ][by ][the ][Revenue is dismissed ][in ][terms]of the aforesaid [Circular ][No.9 ][of ][2024, ][dated ][77'09'2024' ][However' ][if]the appeal comes [within ][the ][exception ][of ][Circular ][No'5 ][of ][2024' ][it]would [pe ]open [to ][the ][Income ][Tax ][Departme...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
tN THE
MONDAY,THE '.'- [TWENTY FIRST DAY.OF ] T,VO TTTOUSAND
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE [P'SAM ]
THE HoNouRABLE [sRl ]'rusrt& [RAo ][NANDIKoNDA]
F 2015NAL APPE [NO:][ 209 ][0]
INCO [ TRIBU]
lncome [Tax ][Tribunal ][Appeal under Sectio-n^.260 ][of ][the ][lncome ][Tax]Act,1961, [asgrieved ][bv ][ir]" ][cjti";"t"0'io ][ol-2015' ][of ][the ][lncome ][Tax]Aooellate [Tribunal, ];=;;" [i"" ][i ][r'n ][No ][asa ][Hvdt2o14' ][for ][the]Assessment [year ][zorcliiii]on'irt" ][tile. ][of ][the ][lncbme ][Tax ][Appellate]?ffi;;i [i;dliauao ][Bench-A' ][HYderabad]
Between:
Principal [Commissioner of lncome Tax ][ ' ][l'T Towers'A C'Guards']Hyderabad.
...APPELLANT
AND
M/S HCC-MEIL-NCC-WPIL [tJVl S-2' Technocrat lndustrial Estates]Balanagar, [HYderabad]
.,.RESPONDENT
Counsel [for ][the ][Appellant: ][MS' ][K' ][MAMATA-CI{OUDARY' ] couNSEL [tNcoME ][riri"riei;riii-r,iex'r'xepntseNieo ][ev ][sRl ][A. RAMA]KRISHNA [, ][stanafrgLounsel ][for lncome ][Tax Department']
: SRI A. [V. RAGHU RAM]Gounsel [for ][the ResPondent]The Court [made ][the ][following]: JUDGMENT
TH EoN'BLE SRIJ USTICE P.SAM KosHY
ANDTN'BL sU TAKDcTTBEo 20JUDGN(per the Honbte Sri Justice p. Sam Koshy)
Heard Mr. A. Rama Krishna Reddy, Iearned Standing Counsel
for Income Tax Department appearing on behalf of the appellant,and, Mr. A.V. Raghu Ram, learned counsel for the respondent.
2' The instant instant appear under section 2604 of the Income Tax under section 2604 of the Income Tax section 2604 of the Income Tax 2604 of the Income Tax of the Income Tax the Income Tax Income Tax Act,1961, has been preferred by the Revenue as the appellant against theorder dated 13'01'2015' passed by the Income Tax Apperate Tribunar,Hyderabad [,,A,, ]Bench, Hyderabad, in I.T.A.No.3 33/Hyd/2OtC for theAssessment yeai 2010_1 1.
The instant instant appear under section 2604 of the Income Tax under section 2604 of the Income Tax section 2604 of the Income Tax 2604 of the Income Tax of the Income Tax the Income Tax Income Tax Act,
3' central Board of Direct Board of Direct of Direct Direct raxes (.BDT) has issued circular No.9 has issued circular No.9 issued circular No.9 circular No.9 No.9 of2024 dated 17.Og.2024, amending the previous Circular No.5 of 2024dated 15'03'2024, by further enhancing the monetary limits for firingappeals by the Income Tax Department before the Income TaxAppe'ate Tribunars' High courts and supreme court as a measure forreducing ritigation' In paragraph 2 0f the said circurar, we find that the
central Board of Direct Board of Direct of Direct Direct raxes (.BDT) has issued circular No.9 has issued circular No.9 issued circular No.9 circular No.9 No.9 of
l
Page2 of 2
limit [fixed ][for ][filing ][an][ appeal ][before ][the ][High ][Court ][is]monetary Rs.2.00 crore.
4In the instant [appeal, ][tax ][effect ][is ][well ][below ][the monetary limit']
5. Therefore, [the ][appeal ][filed ][by ][the ][Revenue is dismissed ][in ][terms]of the aforesaid [Circular ][No.9 ][of ][2024, ][dated ][77'09'2024' ][However' ][if]the appeal comes [within ][the ][exception ][of ][Circular ][No'5 ][of ][2024' ][it]would [pe ]open [to ][the ][Income ][Tax ][Department ][to ][seek revival ][of ][the]a ppea l.
6As a sequel, [miscellaneous ][applications ][pending ][if ][any' ][shall]stand closed. [However, there][ shall ][be ][no ][order ][as ][to ][costs.]
sD/- A.V.S.S.C[.S.M. ] OINT REGISTRAR//TRUE COPY//SECTION
To,
1. The [lncome ][Tax Appellate ][Tribunal' ][Hyderabad ][Bench-A']HYderabad.
'38'rRBItIo'aT*UAMtHiB?HRATil'=-'ittoJLZIANDNG
3. One [CC to SRI ][A'RAMA ] [(SC FOR ][lT)]
4. One CC [to ] [A'V' ][RAGHU RAM Advocate ][ ]
5. Two [CD CoPies]
pcsd/gh
Yx
HIGH COURT
DATED:21 tO4lZOzS
JUDGMENT
ITTA.No.209 of 2O1S
6As a sequel, [miscellaneous ][applications ][pending ][if ][any' ][shall]stand closed. [However, there][ shall ][be ][no ][order ][as ][to ][costs.]
sD/- A.V.S.S.C[.S.M. ] OINT REGISTRAR//TRUE COPY//SECTION
To,
1. The [lncome ][Tax Appellate ][Tribunal' ][Hyderabad ][Bench-A']HYderabad.
'38'rRBItIo'aT*UAMtHiB?HRATil'=-'ittoJLZIANDNG
3. One [CC to SRI ][A'RAMA ] [(SC FOR ][lT)]
4. One CC [to ] [A'V' ][RAGHU RAM Advocate ][ ]
5. Two [CD CoPies]
pcsd/gh
Yx
HIGH COURT
DATED:21 tO4lZOzS
JUDGMENT
ITTA.No.209 of 2O1S
,/{r€0\-:,J(ir.)14 rlJBMa\'* cfs [ra ]rcH[(--O]
DISMISSING THE INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL
4-{4K*
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.