Case Law › High Court › Itta/211/2019 Of Principal Commissioner...

Itta/211/2019 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. M/S Sri Padmavathi Real Estate Consultancies

High Court 16 Oct 2019 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · aphc

Parties

Date of order

16 Oct 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/211/2019 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. M/S Sri Padmavathi Real Estate Consultancies, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE CHIEF JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI AND JUSTICE M.SEETHARAMA MURTI, J I.T.T.A.No.211 of 2019 ORDER: (per J.K.MAHESHWARI, CJ) Shri K.Raji Reddy, learned senior standing counsel for the appellant. In view of letter issued by the Director, Central Board Direct Taxes, New Delhi vide F.No.279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ(Pt.), dated 08.08.2019, the learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw this appeal. Considering the aforesaid, the prayer as made is granted. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications, shall stand closed. J.K. MAHESHWARI, CJ M.SEETHARAMA MURTI, J October 16, 2019 pvd pvd THE CHIEF JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI AND JUSTICE M.SEETHARAMA MURTI, J I.T.T.A.No.211 of 2019 October 16, 2019

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.