Itta/21/2003 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Hyd v. M/S. A.p.s.r.t.c. Hyd
High Court
08 Sep 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/21/2003 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Hyd v. M/S. A.p.s.r.t.c. Hyd
Date of order
08 Sep 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/21/2003 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Hyd v. M/S. A.p.s.r.t.c. Hyd, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.
Decision: Following the same, we dismiss the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
I.T.T.A.No.21 of 2003
JUDGMENT:(Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice L.Narasimha Reddy)
This appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act isfiled at the instance of the Revenue, against the order, dated20.11.2000, passed by the Hyderabad Bench ‘B’ of the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal in I.T.A.No.896/Hyd/1998.
Across the Bar, learned counsel for the appellant fairlysubmits that the issue involved in this appeal is covered by acommon judgment, dated 24.07.2014, passed by this Court inI.T.T.A.Nos.30 and 50 of 2002, against the Revenue.
Following the same, we dismiss the appeal. There shall be noorder as to costs.
The miscellaneous petition filed in this appeal shall alsostand disposed of.
____________________
L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J.
_____________________
CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J.
Date:08.09.2014
GJ
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue