Itta v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
28 Oct 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
28 Oct 2022
Assessment year(s)
1998-99
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itta v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY ,THE TWENW EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENTTHE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYANANDTHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 213 OF 2010
Appeal Under Section 260A of the lncome Tax Act, 1961 against theorder dated 04-04-2008 in l.T.A. No. 557 / Hyd/05 ( Asst. Year 1998-1999) on thefile of the Court of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench "A"Hyderabad preferred against the order of the Commissioner of lncome Tax( Appeals ) -lll, Hyderabad dated '11-04-2005 in ITA No. 131 i JCIT SR-6 / CIT(A) lll / 02-03 preferred against the order of the Joint Commissioner of lncometax ( Assts ) Special Range 6, Hyderabad dated 16-02-20001 in PAN / GIR No.R- 123.
Between:
M/S. Rama Spinners Pvt. Limited, Represented by its Managing Director Mr.GopalAgarwal 2-1-113, Tobacco Bazar, Secunderabad. ...APPELLANTAND
The lncome Tax Officer, Ward 2 (2), Ayakar Bhawan, Hyderabad
...RESPONDENT
l.A. NO: 3 OF 2010(ITTAMP. NO: 56 OF 2010)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stayall further proceedings pursuant to the order dated 04.04,2008 passed by theHon'ble lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'A", in ITANo.557/Hyd/2005 for the Assessment Year 1998-99
Counsel for the Appellant: Ms. Sravani for Sri Chlla Gunaranjan
Counsel for the Respondent: Ms. Sapna Reddy
The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
lE![HON'BLE ] CE U.IJAI ]TIryAN
ANDTII ) IION'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHAIJKAII TI]'DI)Y
I.T.T.A.No.2 13 of 2O 1,0
JUDGME]Y li lPer the I roi'ble ttrc Chtef Jltstice Ujjat Bhtryahl
Hezu I Ms. Sravani, learned counsel fo: the appellantand Ms. lj tpna Reddy, learned counsel for the r,:sFondent.
Lezrr red counsel for the appellant st-rb rl ts that theerppe ant ras settled the tax dispute in l-erms r:f the DirectTax Vivacl Se Visl-ru,as Schenre. Therefore, aptr€llant wouldhl<e to rvitl draw this appeal.
ln \ re\\, of above, the appeal is iismi'rsed onlvith d rau,a
Misc llaneous applications pencling, il any, shallstancl clos d. Ho"vever, there shall be no order as to costs.
Iit )/.B.S.CHIRANJEEVI.IOINT REGISTRAR| . 1L')
,TRUE COPY//
S,ECTION OFFICER
To1The Income 1 ax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench A, l'{yd':rabad2The Commis: oner of lncome Tax ( Appeals ) - lll, Hyder:;bad.3The Joint Co nmissioner of lncome Tax (Assts), Special R rnge-6,Hyderabad.4.One CC to Sr Challa Gunaranjan, Advocate (O,PUC)5One CC to fV ;. Sapna Reddy Advocate r)Two CD Copi ,s3The Joint Co nmissioner of lncome Tax (Assts), Special R rnge-6,Hyderabad.4.One CC to Sr Challa Gunaranjan, Advocate (O,PUC)5One CC to fV ;. Sapna Reddy Advocate r)Two CD Copi ,s7.One Spare Cr pyKulgbrKulgbr
HIGH COURT
DATED:28110 2022
JUDGMENT
lTTA.No.213 rf 2010
I)IS\lISSI\(; IHI: I' t,\ ON WITHDRAWL.
@i*'%>-6-,.P
-1r\f,/!.\li1,, .21 [i:Et ][?[Il]\
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.