Itta/219/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Iv v. National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd
High Court
20 Sep 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/219/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Iv v. National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd
Date of order
20 Sep 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/219/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Iv v. National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence, the present appeal is also dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRAPRADESH AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OFSEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICESRI KALYAN JYOTI SEN GUPTA
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
I.T.T.A. No.219 OF 2012
Between:
The Commissioner of Income Tax-II,Hyderabad
..... Appellant
AND
National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd.,Castle Hills, Masab Tank, Hyderabad.
.....Respondent
The Court made the following :
JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri K.J. Sengupta)
We have heard Mr. J.V. Prasad, learned counselfor the appellant and we have gone through thejudgment and order of the learned Tribunal.
The learned Tribunal has relied on its own earlierjudgment in ITA No. 1791/Hyd/2008, against which anappeal was preferred unsuccessfully.
Hence, the present appeal is also dismissed. Noorder as to costs.
______________________
Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, CJ.
September 20, 2013MAS
_____________
K.C. Bhanu, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.