Case LawHigh Court › Itta/219/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itta/219/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Iv v. National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd

High Court 20 Sep 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/219/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Iv v. National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd
Date of order
20 Sep 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/219/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Iv v. National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Hence, the present appeal is also dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRAPRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OFSEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN PRESENT THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICESRI KALYAN JYOTI SEN GUPTA AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU I.T.T.A. No.219 OF 2012 Between: The Commissioner of Income Tax-II,Hyderabad ..... Appellant AND National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd.,Castle Hills, Masab Tank, Hyderabad. .....Respondent The Court made the following : JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri K.J. Sengupta) We have heard Mr. J.V. Prasad, learned counselfor the appellant and we have gone through thejudgment and order of the learned Tribunal. The learned Tribunal has relied on its own earlierjudgment in ITA No. 1791/Hyd/2008, against which anappeal was preferred unsuccessfully. Hence, the present appeal is also dismissed. Noorder as to costs. ______________________ Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, CJ. September 20, 2013MAS _____________ K.C. Bhanu, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan