Case LawHigh Court › Itta/2/2020 Of The Principal Commissione...

Itta/2/2020 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. M/S. Ijm (India) Infrastructure Ltd

High Court 19 Jul 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/2/2020 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. M/S. Ijm (India) Infrastructure Ltd
Date of order
19 Jul 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/2/2020 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. M/S. Ijm (India) Infrastructure Ltd, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN IHE H'GH COURI FOR Ar rrirHlBlflrE [oF ] 'T,76LT,1}1il,'l'-ilIfl pf;"g*g,.' PRESENT SRIJrH E HoNouR^".. st[,.#: lm"JffiI [*.] THE HONOURABLE SRIJ tNCoMETAX TRIBUNALAPPEAL NO: 20F 2020 (rncome Tax Tribunar Appear Under section 260 A of the rncome Tax Act,against the order of the rncome Tax Apperate Tribunar, Hyderabad Bench ,8"Hyderabad in ITA No. 173zr,yDr2o16 for assessment year 2012_2013 dated27-03-2019 preferred against the order of the commissioner of rncome Tax _(APPEALS)- 2, Hyderabad in rrA No.0'16 312015-16 dared 31-08-2016 preferredagainst the Order of the Deputy Commissioner of lncome TaxlCircle _2 (1),Hyderabad PAN/ctR No. AAACT 7067 Adated 28_03_2015 )Between: The Principal Commissioner of lncome Tax_2, Hyderabad. ,..APPELLANT AND It//s. lJIt/(lndia) lnfrastructure Lld , FL No. 1-89/1 ,3rd and 4th Ftoor, ptot No.42and 43, Kavuri Hills, [phase-1, ]I\/adhapur, Hyderabad.and 43, Kavuri Hills, [phase-1, ]I\/adhapur, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: Ms. K. MAMATA CHOUDARY, SR. SC FOR t.T. DEPT.Counsel for the Respondent: --The Court made the following: ORDERThe Court made the following: ORDER HONOURABLE [SRI' ] [M'S'RAMACHANDRA ] ANDHONOURABLE [T' ] I.T.[T.A][.NO][.20][F][ )][020] '"""'ffi'"o*oo' Ms.K.MamataChowdary,leamedStandingCounselforlncomeTax Department [has ][filed ][a ][ietter ][requesting ][to ][permit ][the ][appeilant to]withclraw [this ][Appeal on the ][ground that ][the ][respondent ][had ][filed ][an]Application [ttnder ][the ][Direct Tax ][Vivad ][Se ][Vishwas ][Scheme' ][2020 ][with]in the [event ][of ][failuLe ][of ][satislactory]liberty to[revive ][the ][APPeal]resolutiot-t [under the ][said Scheme'] )I {eard the [leartred ][counsel ][1br ][the ][Appellant] Granting [liberty ][as ][sought, ][this Appeal ][is ][dismissed ][as ][withdrawn'] 4Pending miscellaneous [petitions, ][if ][any, ][in this ][Appeal shall ][also] stand dismissed. [No ][costs.] SD/-K.SRINIVASA RAOJOINT REGISTRAR[-SECTION OFFICER //TRUE GOPY// To, 1. The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'B', Hyderabad 2. The Commissioner of lncome Tax - ( Appeals) 2 Hyderabad 3. The Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax / Circle -2 (1), Hyderabad 4. One CC to lvls. K. I\,4amata Choudary, Advocate IOPUC] 5. Two CD Copies 6. One Spare Copy Kulgbrt\{} HIGH COURT DATED: 19102t2021 ORDERlTTA.No.2 ot 2020 DISMISSING THE ITTA AS WITHDRAWNWITHOUT COSTS 2\[-)$*] ,i €o;IaooJ,03 i\,'JG2021,}"()g:)(.\}
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan