Case Law › High Court › Itta/220/2017 Of Principal Commissioner...

Itta/220/2017 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Visakhapatnam v. Duddupudi Prasad, Visakhapatnam

High Court 02 Jan 2025 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · aphc

Parties

Date of order

02 Jan 2025

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/220/2017 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Visakhapatnam v. Duddupudi Prasad, Visakhapatnam, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

APHC010658892017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3516] THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHANTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAYINCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 220/2017 Between: Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Visakhapatnam ...APPELLANT AND Duddupudi Prasad Visakhapatnam ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: 1.K RAJI REDDY(SENIOR SC_ INCOME TAX DEPT) Counsel for the Respondent: The Court made the following:- Judgment:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B. Krishna Mohan) The learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this appeal, for which, he also filed a letter dated 16.11.2024. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN __________________________ JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.