Itta/2/2025 Of Peravala Venkata Nageswara Rao v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
05 Mar 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · aphc
Parties
Itta/2/2025 Of Peravala Venkata Nageswara Rao v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
05 Mar 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/2/2025 Of Peravala Venkata Nageswara Rao v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
WEDNESDAY ,THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVEPRESENTHONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYAAND
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAOINCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL Nos. 2, 6 and 7 OF 2025INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 2 OF 2025
Between:
PeravalaVenkataNageswaraRaoD.No20-245,BrahmapuramMachilipatnam...Appellant
AND
Income Tax Officer, Ward-I, Machilipatnam
...RespondentAppeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against theConsolidated order in MA No.30/viz/2023, Asst Year 2013-2014 for in theITA Nos.174/viz/2020 dated 16-11-2022 on the file of the Income TaxAppellateTribunal,VisakhapatnamBench,Visakhapatnampreferredagainst the order of the CIT(A), VJA-ITA No.272/CIT (A)A/JA/2016-17,dated 25.09.2017 for the year 2013-14 on the file of the Commissioner ofIncome Tax (Appeals), Vijayawada.
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 6 OF 2025
Between:
PeravalaVenkataNageswaraRaoD.No20-245,BrahmapuramMachilipatnam
AND
Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Machilipatnam
...Appellant
...Respondent
Appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against theConsolidated order in MA No.29/viz/2023, Asst Year 2012-2013 for in the
ITA Nos. 173/viz/2020 dated 16-11-2022 on the file of the Income TaxAppellateTribunal,VisakhapatnamBenchVisakhapatnampreferredagainst the order of the CIT(A),VJA-ITA No.273/CIT(A)/VJA/2016-1 7dated25.09.2017 for the year 2012-13 on the file of the Commissionerof IncomeTax (Appeals), Vijayawada.INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 7 OF 2Q2fiBetween:PeravalaVenkataNageswaraRaoD.No20-245,BrahmapuramMachilipatnam
AND
Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Machilipatnam
...Appellant
...RespondentAppeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act1961 against theConsolidated order in MA No.28/viz/2023, Asst Year 2011-2012 forin theITA Nos.174A/iz/2020 dated 16^11^2022on thefileof the Income TaxAppellateTribunal,VisakhapatnamBench,Visakhapatnampreferredagainst the order of the CIT(A),VJA-ITA No.270/CIT(A)A/JA/2016-1 7, dated25.09.2017 for the year 2011-12 on the file of the Commissioner of IncomeTax (Appeals), Vijayawada.Counsel for the Appellant: Sri. B V S Chalapati RaoCounsel for the Respondent: —
The Court made the following JUDGMENT:
APHC010255802024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESHSMSAT AMARAVATI(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3526]
WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCHTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL Nos:2. 6 and 7 of 2025
I.T.T.A No.2 of 2025
Between:Peravala Venkata Nageswara RaoD.No:20-245, Brahmapuram,Machilipatnam....AppellantANDIncome Tax Officer, Ward-IMachilipatnam....RespondentI.T.T.A No.6 of 2025Between:Peravala Venkata Nageswara Rao,D.No:20-245, Brahmapuram,Machilipatnam....AppellantANDIncome Tax Officer, Ward-IMachilipatnam....RespondentI.T.T.A No.7 of 2025Between:Peravala Venkata Nageswara Rao,D.No:20-245, Brahmapuram,Machilipatnam....Appellant
AND
Income Tax Officer, Ward-1,
Machilipatnam.
Counsel for the Appellant; 1.Mr. B V S Chalapati Rao
...Respondent
Counsel for the Respondent: 1.
The Court made the following Common Judgment:
The present appeals are filed under Section 260A of the Income TaxAct,1961,againsttheorderoftheIncomeTaxAppellateTribunal,Visakhapatnam, dated 20.02.2024 in the Miscellaneous Applications filed bythe appellant/assessee.
2.The learned counsel for the appellant drawing reference[to][ the]letterdated 28.02.2025 submits that the appellant opted for Direct Tax Vivad SeVishwas Scheme by filing Form-I and thematteris pendingbeforetheconcerned authorities.
3.He seeks withdrawal of the appeals with a liberty to[work]outhisremedies, in the event of any adverse orders.
4.Giving liberty as prayed for, these Income Tax Tribunal Appealsaredismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending,if any,shall stand closed.
Counsel for the Respondent: 1.
The Court made the following Common Judgment:
The present appeals are filed under Section 260A of the Income TaxAct,1961,againsttheorderoftheIncomeTaxAppellateTribunal,Visakhapatnam, dated 20.02.2024 in the Miscellaneous Applications filed bythe appellant/assessee.
2.The learned counsel for the appellant drawing reference[to][ the]letterdated 28.02.2025 submits that the appellant opted for Direct Tax Vivad SeVishwas Scheme by filing Form-I and thematteris pendingbeforetheconcerned authorities.
3.He seeks withdrawal of the appeals with a liberty to[work]outhisremedies, in the event of any adverse orders.
4.Giving liberty as prayed for, these Income Tax Tribunal Appealsaredismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending,if any,shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/- S.V.S.R. MURTHY
JOINT REGISTRAR
SECTION OFFICER
To.
1. TheIncomeTaxAppellateTribunalVisakhapatnamBench,VisakhapatnamBench,Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam district
2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Vijayawada,KrishnaDistrict
3. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Machilipatnam, Krishna District
4. One CC to Sri. B V S Chalapati Rao Advocate
5. Three CD Copies
HIGH COURT
DATED:05/03/2025
COMMON JUDGMENTITTA.No.2, 6 and 7 of 2025
o\g27 MAR 2025^. Curreni aeciion*1/
DISMISSING THE ittA’s AS WITHDRAWNWITHOUT COSTS
t
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.