Itta/221/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri R. Ramulu
High Court
20 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/221/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri R. Ramulu
Date of order
20 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/221/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri R. Ramulu, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Sri Narasimha sarma, learned counsel having accepted noticerequests four weeks time to file counter.There shall be interim suspension subject to the condition of thepetitioner depositing a further sum of Rupees Five Lakhs apart from theamount stated to have been already paid, within a period of four...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESHAT HYDERABAD
MONDAY THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBERTWO THOUSAND AND FIVE
: PRESENT :
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE : B.SUDERSHAN REDDYAND
THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE: S. ANANDA REDDYI.T.T.A.M.P. No. 221 OF 2005
IN
I.T.T.A. NO. 205 OF 2005
Between:
Jubilee Hills International Centre, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad.
Petitioner(Appellant in I.T.T.A.No. 205 of 2005 on the file of the High Court)AND
Income Tax Officer, Ward-6(3), Hyderabad.
Respondent
(Respondent in –do-)
Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed therein the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operationof the Assessment Order dated 31-3-2004 passed by the ITO Ward 6(3) for theassessment year 2000-01 as confirmed by the ITAT pending I.T.T.A. No. 205 of2005 on the file of the High Court.
The Appeal coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and theaffidavit filed therein support thereof and the order of the High Court dt. 3-10-2005,made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. C. Kodanda Ram, Advocate forPetitioner.ORDER :
“Notice. Sri Narasimha sarma, learned counsel having accepted noticerequests four weeks time to file counter.There shall be interim suspension subject to the condition of thepetitioner depositing a further sum of Rupees Five Lakhs apart from theamount stated to have been already paid, within a period of four weeks failingof which the stay petition shall stand dismissed.”
REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
ASSISTANT
for ASSISTANTREGISTRAR
To
1. Income Tax Officer, Ward-6(3), Hyderabad.2. Two spare copies.MVJ.
HIGH COURT
BRSRJ & SAR, J
DATE: 17-10-2005
ORDER
I.T.T.A.M.P.NO. 221 OF 2005INI.T.T.A.NO. 205 OF 2005
INTERIM SUSPENSION
MVJDRAFTED ON 18-10-2005
HIGH COURT
BRSRJ & SAR, J
DATE: 17-10-2005
ORDER
I.T.T.A.M.P.NO. 221 OF 2005INI.T.T.A.NO. 205 OF 2005
INTERIM SUSPENSION
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.