Itta/222/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) v. M/S Balaji Transport Agency
High Court
01 Jun 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/222/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) v. M/S Balaji Transport Agency
Date of order
01 Jun 2017
Assessment year(s)
2009-10, 2006-07
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/222/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) v. M/S Balaji Transport Agency, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Therefore, the present appeal does not merit consideration and is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE SANJAY KUMAR AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE GUDI SEVA SHYAM PRASAD
I .T.T.A.No.222 of 2017
ORDER:(per SK,J)
This appeal arises out of the common order dated 02.08.2013 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bench-B, Hyderabad, in several appeals relating to the assessment years 2003-04 to 2009-10. This appeal relates to I.T.A.No.905 of 2012 before the Tribunal pertaining to the assessment year 2009-10.
While so, it is brought to our notice that I.T.T.A.No.321 of 2014 filed by the Revenue against the very same common order in relation to the assessment year 2006-07 was dismissed by this Court on 04.06.2014. Therefore, the present appeal does not merit consideration and is accordingly dismissed.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed. No order as to costs.
____________________
JUSTI CE SANJAY KUMAR
_____________________________
JUSTI CE GUDI SEVA SHYAM PRASAD Date:01.06.2017
GJ
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue