Case LawHigh Court › Itta/223/2017 Of Principal Commissioner...

Itta/223/2017 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Smt.bonagiri Satyavati

High Court 06 Nov 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · aphc
Parties
Itta/223/2017 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Smt.bonagiri Satyavati
Date of order
06 Nov 2024
Assessment year(s)
2007-2008
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itta/223/2017 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Smt.bonagiri Satyavati, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATIWEDNESDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOURPRESENTTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.NARENDAR AND THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHARincome tax tribunal appeal NO: 223 OF 2017 Appeal under section 260 A of Income Tax Actaggrieved by theorder dated 02.03.2016 in I.T.A No.281A/iz/2012(Assessment years 2007-2008) before the Hon'ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VisakhapatnamBench,VisakhapatnamandpreferredagainsttheorderoftheCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Visakhapatnamdated25-01-2011bearingAppealNo.lTA No.172,173,174,175&180/ITO,Wd-3,RJY/10- 11/11-12 and preferred against the order of theIncome TaxOfficer, Ward-3, Rajahmundryin PAN No. ARSPB 0758M/A.Y.2007-2008/ITO/W-3/RJY, dated 29-12-2010. E5etween: PrincipalCommissionerOfIncomeTax0/o.AayakarBhavan,NearKambala Tank, Veerabadrapuram, Rajahmundry-533 105....APPELLANT/RESPONDENT AND Smt.Bonagiri Satyavati, W/o.Surya Ratna Narasimha Murthy,0/o.Palacharla Village, Rajanagaram Mandal, Rajahmundry. {PANNO.ARSPB0758M} Counsel for the Appellant.SRI B NARASIMHA SARMACounsel for the Respondent: None AppearedThe Court made the following: ...RESPONDENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G. NARENDARAND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR l■T■T■A■No■223 of 2017 JUDGMENT:(per Hon’ble Sri Justice G. Narendar) SriB. Vamsi Krishna, learned Junior Standing CounselforIncome Tax appearing for the appellant, prays leave of the Court towithdraw the instant appeal, as the same falls below the monetarylimits fixedby the CentralBoardof Direct Taxes videCircularNo.09/2024, F.No.279/Misc./M-74/2024-ITJ dated 17.09.2024. 2.Submission of the learned counsel is placed on record. Leavegranted.granted. 3.Accordingly,theinstantappealstandsdisposedofaswithdrawn. As a sequel, pending interlocutory applications,ifany.shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// SD/- E. KAMESWARA RAOJOINT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,1The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Visakhapatnam[Bench,][ at]Visakhapatnam,1The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Visakhapatnam[Bench,][ at]Visakhapatnam, 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Visakhapatnam,Visakhapatnam District.Visakhapatnam District. 3. The Income-Tax Officer, Ward-3, Rajahmundry, East[Godavari][ District.] 4. OneCCto SRI. B. NARASIMHA SARMA, Advocate 5.Three C.D.Copies nm HIGH COURTDATED:06/11/2024 JUDGMENTlTTA.No.223 of 2017 ^OFANOS^cJ2 4 FEB 2025M^. Current Section. DISPOSING OF THIS I.T.T.A AS WITHDRAWN
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan