In Itta/224/2018 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. Sri P.raghunandha Rao, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
APHC010816112018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3516]
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHANTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAYINCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 224/2018
Between:
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-i
...APPELLANT
AND
Sri P Raghunandha Rao
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant:
1.ANUP KOUSHIK KARAVADI
Counsel for the Respondent:
1.
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B. Krishna Mohan)
The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Appeal on monitory limit basis.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated.
As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________
JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN
________________________
JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
21.01.2025
PGT
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue