Itta/225/2008 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Rajahmundry v. Padala Satyanarayana Reddy
High Court
29 Apr 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · aphc
Parties
Itta/225/2008 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Rajahmundry v. Padala Satyanarayana Reddy
Date of order
29 Apr 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/225/2008 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Rajahmundry v. Padala Satyanarayana Reddy, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, this Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty sought for.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
I.T.T.A.No.225 OF 2008
JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice A.V.Sesha Sai)
The learned Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department would submit that in terms of Central Board Direct Taxes Circular No.17 of 2019, dated 08.08.2019, all appeals where the tax effect is below Rs.1,00,00,000/- are required to be withdrawn, and as the value of the present appeal is less than Rs.1,00,00,000/-, the appellant may be permitted to withdraw the appeal. The learned counsel would further submit that liberty may be granted, in case it were to be found later that the subject matter of the appeal falls within the exceptions mentioned in the circular issued by the Central Board to file an application for restoration of the appeal.
Accordingly, this Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty sought for. There shall be no order as to costs of the Appeal.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand closed.
___________________
A.V.SESHA SAI, J
_________________________
RAVI NATH TILHARI, J
siva
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
I.T.T.A. No.225 OF 2008
Date: 29.04.2022
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.