Itta/226/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. M/S. Tci Hi-Ways Pvt. Ltd
High Court
10 Jul 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/226/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. M/S. Tci Hi-Ways Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
10 Jul 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/226/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. M/S. Tci Hi-Ways Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND
THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO.226 OF 2013
DATED:10.7.2013
Between:
Commissioner of Income Tax-IIHyderabad … Appellant
And
M/s. TCI Hi-ways Pvt. Ltd.,1-7-293, MG RoadSecunderabad … Respondent
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND
THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI
I.T.T.A. NO.226 OF 2013
JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
Having heard Mr. S.R. Ashok, learned counsel appearing for theappellant, and having gone through the impugned judgment and orderof the learned Tribunal, we are of the opinion that no question of law isinvolved in this matter.
The learned Tribunal in exercise of its discretion has reducedexpenses from Rs.70,00,000/- to Rs.54,90,737/-. As those expenseswere unvouched, the Assessing Officer made an estimate in his ownbona fide, at a sum of Rs.70,00,000/-. The learned Tribunal found thatit is highly disproportionate. Therefore, we cannot substitute ourdiscretion in this appeal.
The appeal is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs.
________________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
______________________
G. ROHINI, J 10.7.2013
bnr
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.