Itta/227/2006 Of Mr. K.b. Krishna Murthy v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Hyderabad
High Court
19 Jan 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/227/2006 Of Mr. K.b. Krishna Murthy v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Hyderabad
Date of order
19 Jan 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/227/2006 Of Mr. K.b. Krishna Murthy v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Hyderabad, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI [JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO]
AND
THE HONOURABLE [JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR]
INCOME[TA,X ]TRIBUNAL [| ][227 ][0F ][2006]
(lncomeTaxTribunalAppealunderSection260AofthelncomeTaxAct'1961 against the [order ][of ][the ][lncome Tax Appellate ][Tribunal, ][Hyderabad ][Bench].A',HyderabadinlTANo.248tHydl2OO3andC.o.No.19/Hydl2004forAssessment Year [2000-01 ][daled 22-12-2005, preferred against ][the ][order ][of ][the]Commissioner of [lncome ][Tax ][(Appeals) ][lV ][Hyderabad, vide ][Appeal ][No ][762lDC]6 (1) CIT [(A)-lV/ ][01-02, ][1202.2002 ][preferred ][against ][the ][Order ][of ][the ][Deputy]Commissioner of [lncome tax, ][Circle ][-6 (1) Hyderabad, PAN/GlR ][No ] [6]('1) dated 23.01.2002.
Between:
Mr. K.B. Krishna [Murthy, ][Mr. ][K.B. Krishna ][tr/lurthy, ][Flat ][No ][202' ]["NEST'Apts' ][6-]3-2521 1 16, Erramanzil, [Hyderabad-500 ][082']
...APPellant
AND
Deoutv Commissioner [of ][lncome Tax, Circle ][3 (3), ][Aayakar ][Bhavan, ][Aayakar]eiburh, Basheerbagh, [Hyderabad-500 029']
...Respondent
Counsel for the [Appellant: ] [A' ]
Counsel for the Respondent: [B. NARASIMHA SARMA, SC FOR INCOME ] The Court made [the ][following: ]
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE [M.S,RAMACHANDRA ]
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD
I.T.T.A.No.227 of 2OOb
JUDGMENT : iPer Hon'Llf sri .lusr.c [I'1 ]:i lt:unt( [han(lra liaol]
Learned counsL-l for appellzrnt seeks to \vithdrau thisAppeal to initiate proceedings under the Sabka [Vishrvas]Scheme declared by the Government of India with liberty [to]revive the Appeal in the event the appellant does not [get]satisfactory result in the said Scheme.
2. Granting liberty as sought for, this appeal is dismissedas t,ithdra',vn. No co sts.
3. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any,sfrail stand closed.
To,
SD/. B.S. CHIRANJEEVIJOINT REGISTRARCsi)SECTION OFFICER
/iTRUE COPYi/
1The tncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, [Hyderabad ][Bench ]['A', ][Flyderabad]2The Commissioner of lncome [Tax (Appeals)- lV ][Hyderabad.]2The Commissioner of lncome [Tax (Appeals)- lV ][Hyderabad.]
3The Deputy Commissioner of lncome [tax, Circle 6 (1) ][Hyderabad]
4One CC to Sri A. Sanjay Kishore, Advocate 6One CC to Sri B. Narasimha Sarma, [for ][lncome Tax, Advocate ]IOPUC]6One CC to Sri B. Narasimha Sarma, [for ][lncome Tax, Advocate ]IOPUC]
Two CD Copies
MMK
\;\*-
HIGH COURT
MSRJ&TVKJ
DATED:19/01/2021
.$:1l-iEs(3 [t27 ]JAil202lO).t, ,''..1'",9
JUDGMENTITTA.No.227 of [2006]
DISMISSING THE
27
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.