Itta v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 1(4), Hyderabad
High Court
10 Apr 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 1(4), Hyderabad
Date of order
10 Apr 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 1(4), Hyderabad, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT
THURSDAY ,THE TWO THOUSAND [T$/ENTY ]
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE [JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY]ANDTHE HONOURABLE [.TUSiICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA]
INCOME UNAL AP [S: ][227 AN] [26 ][0F ][2008]
INCOME TAX TRIBU i EAL NO: [2]270
aoainst lncome the [Order ][Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 260A of ][dated ]'ddlogtzOoO passed in ITA [the ]No'507/H/200'1 [lncome Tax Act'1961]for their.lililrlfi vl"i'rse6-_1eg7"; [td ][fite ][of ][the ][tncome ][Tax ][Appellate ][Trlbunal,]Hyderabad [Bench'B', ][HYderabad]
Between:
GOWRA '1-8-144' [1st Floor' ][Prenderghast]Road, Secunderabad
...APPELLANT
AND
ASSISTANT [COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE ][1(4)']HYDERABAD.
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for [the ]{PPellant:SRI S RAVICounsel for [the ][ResPondent:]SRI J J V PRASAD
SRI J J V PRASAD [(Sr. ] [FoR ][INCoME TAX)]
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 326 oF 2008
agarnst [1glg [Tax ]the order [Tribunat ]dated [npp.:1.^Ul99t-section ]0810912006 passed [2604 ]in " rrA of the No. tncome soSt+r2ool Tax Act..tg6.lfoi ttreffi [::;[:T ]1.""""?' J : flil:..:i fJ tn e ri rE- oi ?e i n "o'" i,,- 6 # r h*;' riii,,.i, r,
Between:
3,:HHr*iA:i::r.ttRrIAXtXB. [L'M'rED,, ][1-8-144, ][1st ][f,oor,]
...APPELLANT
AND
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Circle 1 [4], Hyderabad,...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appefiant: SRI S RAVICounsel for the Respondent: SRI J V PRASAD (Sr. SC FOR INCOME TAX)Counsel for the Respondent: SRI J V PRASAD (Sr. SC FOR INCOME TAX)The Court made the following: COMMON JUDGMENT
THE HON[,BLE ] [ JUSTICE][ P.SAM][ KOSHY]
AND
THE HO[N'BLE ] [ JUSTICE ][N] [ NANDIKONDA]
INCOME [T]AX TRIBUN [ Nos.227 ][&][ 326 ][0F ][2008]
COMMON[JUDGMENT'. ][ber ][Hon'bte ][Sri ][Jlstice ][P'Sam ][Koshg)]
Today, when these [matters are taken ][up ][for ][hearing' ][learned]counsel for [the ][appellant ][submits that ][the dispute ][between ][the parties]has been settled [al1d ][they ][do ][not ][intend ][to ][pursue ][these appeals arty]further, therefore, [prays ][for ][withdrawal ofthese ][appeals']
2. As prayed [for, ][these appedls are dismissed ][as ][withdrawn']
As a sequel, [miscellaneous ][applications ][pending ][if ][any' ][shall]stand closed,
SD/. K. SHYLESHI.totur [RectsrRAn]SECTION
,ITRUE [COPY"]
To,
The lncome lncome [Tax Appellate Tribunal' Hyderabad Bench ]['8" ][Hyderabad']
1.The lncome lncome 2.One CC [to ][SRI' ] [Advocate ]3One CC [to ] [(Sr' ] [TAX) Advocate 2.One CC [to ][SRI' ] [Advocate ]3One CC [to ] [(Sr' ] [TAX) Advocate
4Two CD [CoPies]
TPK/ghw
HIGH COURT
DATED:10t04t2l?,s
,.-.2:::'_i- '--.- --,/ . |.\ [\' - ]., i.^- \,1' [\' ],_r [\S.]' ).''-. li22 tlJB 26COMMON JUDGMENT\,?+\.
ITTA.No.22t ot 2008 ANDITTA.No.326 of 2008
ITTAS ARE DISMISSED AS WTHDRAWN
6rq1*.ffi*
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.