In Itta/227/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax V v. Smt. Ch. Uma, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: NO.227 OF 2013 JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) After going through the impugned judgment and order of thelearned Tribunal and having heard the learned Lawyer for theappellant, we dismiss this appeal, as, on similar facts andcircumstances, this Court has dismiss...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND
THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO.227 OF 2013
DATED:10.7.2013
Between:
The Commissioner of Income Tax-VIT Towers, A.C. GuardsHyderabad … Appellant
And
Smt. CH. Uma … Respondent
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND
THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI
I.T.T.A. NO.227 OF 2013
JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
After going through the impugned judgment and order of thelearned Tribunal and having heard the learned Lawyer for theappellant, we dismiss this appeal, as, on similar facts andcircumstances, this Court has dismissed another connected appealbeing I.T.T.A. No.157 of 2013, by judgment dt.2.7.2013.
No order as to costs.
________________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
______________________
G. ROHINI, J
10.7.2013
bnr
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue