Itta/228/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Iv v. Margadarshi Chit Fund Pvt. Ltd
High Court
10 Jul 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/228/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Iv v. Margadarshi Chit Fund Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
10 Jul 2013
Assessment year(s)
2008-09
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/228/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Iv v. Margadarshi Chit Fund Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
ITTA .NO:228 of 2013
Between:
The Commissioner of Income Tax IV Hyderabad ....
Petitioner
AND
Margadarshi Chit Fund Pvt. Ltd., 5-10-195, Fatehmaidan Road, Hyderabad
.....Respondent
AFFIDAVITI ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT COMPANY
I S. Venkata Swamy, S/o Ramadas, aged about 62 years, Occ:General Manager, of Respondent Company, do hereby solemnly sincerely oath asfollows.
I am the General Manager Finance in the above esteemedrespondent Company I Know the facts of the case,
the Writ Petition filed under Article 226 praying that in the High Courtwill be pleased to set aside the Order of the Tribunal in ITA No. 973/H/2011 dt. 24-2-2012 for A.Y. 2008-09, the petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petitionand the affidavit filed in support thereof and the order of the High Court order dated10/07/2013 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of SRI J VPRASAD (SCFOR INCOME TAX) Advocate for the Petitioner(s) and the Court pleased todisposed on 10-07-2013 without appearing of our company.
Hence, I request the Hon’ble Court may pleased to permit me to takecertified copy of the order in ITTA. 228 of 2013, dated 10-07-2013. I am filingherewith Vakalath also and or pass such other order or orders in the interest ofjustice
SWORN and Signedbefore me on this06-03-2014
Before me
Attester, Hyderabad Deponent
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.