Itta/232/2003 Of The Commissioner Or Income Tax-Iii v. M/S.sri Siddhi Venkayaka Agro
High Court
17 Sep 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/232/2003 Of The Commissioner Or Income Tax-Iii v. M/S.sri Siddhi Venkayaka Agro
Date of order
17 Sep 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/232/2003 Of The Commissioner Or Income Tax-Iii v. M/S.sri Siddhi Venkayaka Agro, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Therefore, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDYANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
I.T.T.A No. 232 OF 2003
17-09-2014
BETWEEN
Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Hyderabad
…Appellant
And
Sri Siddivinayaka Agro Extractions (P) Ltd., 3-3-97, Subashgunj,Zaheerabad
…..Respondent
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDYANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
I.T.T.A No. 232 OF 2003
JUDGMENT:(per the Hon'ble Sri Justice L. Narasimha Reddy)
This appeal is preferred against the order, dated
31-07-2002, passed by the Hyderabad Bench ‘B’ of the IncomeTax Appellate Tribunal in ITA No.492/Hyd/1998.
Learned Senior Counsel for the appellant in all fairnessstated that the tax impact in this appeal is less than the limitstipulated under Section 268A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. There shall be no order
as to costs.
17-09-2014ks
___________________________L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J
____________________________
CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue