Itta/232/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. Hyderabad Race Club, Malakpet
High Court
27 Mar 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/232/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. Hyderabad Race Club, Malakpet
Date of order
27 Mar 2014
Assessment year(s)
2005-06
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/232/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. Hyderabad Race Club, Malakpet, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether, on the facts and circumstances of thecase, the Appellate Tribunal is justified in deleting thedisallowance made under Section 40A(3) of the Income TaxAct, 1961 on account of payments made in cash in excess ofRs.20,000/-?
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A.No.232 of 2014
Date: 27.03.2014
Between:Commissioner of Income Tax-II,Hyderabad
.....Appellant
AND
Hyderabad Race Club,Hyderabad
...Respondent
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A.No.232 of 2014
JUDGMENT:(per Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta )
This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of the learnedTribunal dated 7[th] March 2012 in relation to the assessment year 2005-06and sought to be admitted on the following suggested questions of law:
A. Whether, on the facts and circumstances of thecase, the Appellate Tribunal is justified in deleting thedisallowance made under Section 40A(3) of the Income TaxAct, 1961 on account of payments made in cash in excess ofRs.20,000/-?
B. In spite of there being no detracting factors againstpayment of winning amount by cheque to the punters, whetherthe Appellate Tribunal is justified in directing extension of thebenefit of Rule 6DD(j) of the IT Rules to the transactions inquestion merely on account of the payment being made on aholiday?
The aforesaid questions clearly indicate that the appeal is preferredin relation to a portion of the judgment. We have seen the findings of thelearned Tribunal, wherein it is held that the payments made to punters onthe winning tickets clearly constitute business expenditure and the same issquarely covered under the provisions of Section 40A(3) of the Income TaxAct, 1961. When the fact-finding supports the law, we cannot reappreciatethe same. We, therefore, upheld the decision of the learned Tribunal in thismatter.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs.
___________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
__________________
SANJAY KUMAR,
J
27-03-2014
Gsn
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.