Itta/235/2007 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Padala Satyanarayana Reddy
High Court
16 Jun 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · aphc
Parties
Itta/235/2007 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Padala Satyanarayana Reddy
Date of order
16 Jun 2022
Assessment year(s)
1987-88
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/235/2007 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Padala Satyanarayana Reddy, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, this Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn[with]the liberty sought for.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVAi:t-|^'^
THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNETWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
o•m-
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A V SESHA SAIANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TI^HARI
*
ITTA NO: 235 OF 2007
(Appeal Under Section 260(A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961preferred against theorder of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench, Visakhapatnamin IT A No.64A/izag/02 for the Assessment Year 1987-88to1997-98,dated23.11.2006preferredagainsttheorderoftheCommissionerofIncomeTax(Appeals), RajahmundryinITA.No. 47n-r/C-1 RJY/CTT(A)RJY/1999-2000,dated21.09.2001 & 30.01.2002preferred against the order of the Deputy Commissionerof Income Tax, Circle-1, Rajahmundry in PAN/GIR.No.S-1020Dated:-02-2000)
Between;
Commissioner of Income Tax, Rajahmundry
...APPELLANT
AND
Padala Satyanarayana Reddy, R/o.D.No.74-7-3, Prakashnagar, Rajahmundry,
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellants: SMT.M.KIRANMAYEECounsel for the Respondents: SRI S. RAVIThe Court made the following:
-\
*
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAIAND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
I.T.T.A.No.235 of 2007
ORDER:- (Per AVSS,J)
Smt.M.Kiranmayee,learnedStandingCounselfortheIncome Tax Department would submit that in terms of[Central]Board Direct Taxes Circular No. 17 of 2019, dated 08.08.2019,allappealswherethetaxeffectisbelowRs. 1,00,00,000/-arerequired to be withdrawn, and as the value of the present[appeal]is less than Rs. 1,00,00,000/-, the appellant may be permitted towithdraw the appeal. The learned counsel would further[submit]that liberty may be granted, in case it were to be[found][ later][ that]thesubjectmatterof theappealfallswithintheexceptionsmentioned in the circular issued by the Central Boardtofile anapplication for restoration of the appeal.
Accordingly, this Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn[with]the liberty sought for. There shall be no order as[to][ costs][ of][ the]Appeal.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if[any,][ in]this appeal shall stand closed.
SD/-M.RAMESH BABUDEPUTVj REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam[Bench,][ Visakhapatnam]
2.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Rajahmundry
3. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1,[Rajahmundry]
4.One CC to Smt. M. Kiranmayee, Advocate 5.One CC to Sri S. Ravi, Advocate 6.Two CD Copiespsrssb5.One CC to Sri S. Ravi, Advocate 6.Two CD Copiespsrssb
HIGH COURT
DATED:16/06/2022
ORDER
ITTA.No.235 of 2007
DISMISSING THE ITTA AS WITHDRAW
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.