Itta/238/2010 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.gmr Holdings Pvt Ltd
High Court
10 Feb 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/238/2010 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.gmr Holdings Pvt Ltd
Date of order
10 Feb 2025
Assessment year(s)
2002-03
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/238/2010 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.gmr Holdings Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Therefore, the appeal filed by the Deparlment is dismissed interms of the aforesaid Circular No.9 of 2024 dated 17.09.2024.However, if the appeal comes within the exception of CircularNo.5 of 2024, it would be open to the Income Tax Department toseek revival ofthe appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHYANDTHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
ITTA No: 238 of 2010
lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 2604 [of ]the lncome [Tax ][Act, ][1961]against the Order dated 11-07-2008 [passed ]in [lTA.No.209/Hyd/2006 ][for ][the]Assessment Year 2002-03 on the file of the lncome Tax [Appellate ][Tribunal,]Hyderabad ['B' ]Bench, Hyderabad, [preferred ]against [the ][Order ][dated ][12-01-2006]passed in Appeal No.96/CC-3/C IT(A)-|V/05-06 on the file of the Commissioner [of]lncome Tax (Appeals)-lV, Hyderabad, [preferred ]against [the Order dated 28-03-2005]passed in PAN/GIR No.V210lCC-3 on the file of the Deputy Commissioner oflncome Tax Central Circle-3, Hyderabad.
Between:
Commissioner of lncome Tax, Bangalore-l [Central Revenue Building, ][Queens]Road, Bangalore - 560 001 [. ][(Present ]authority [with Jurisdiction ][over ][the matter)]
...Appellant
AND
M/s.GtvlR Holdings Pvt Ltd, O/o.6-3-866/'1G2, [Greenlands, ][Begumpet,]Hyderabad - 16. AND Presently [2511 ], Skip [House, ][Museum ][Road, ][Bangalore ]-560 025
...Respondent
Counsel for the Appellant: Ms.B. Sapna [Reddy, ][Junior Standing ][Counsel]. representing Mr. J.V. Prasad, Senior Counsel [for ][lT ][Department]
Counsel for the Respondent: [.None ]Appeared
The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
*7
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SA}T KOSHYANDTHE HC)NOTIRABLE SRIJUSTICE NARSTNG RAONANDIKONDA
ITTA No.238 OF 2010
ruDGMENI';. (per Hon'hle Sri Justice P.Sam Koshy)
Heard Ms. B.Sapna Reddy, leamed Junior Standing
Counsel representing Mr. J.V.Prasad, learned Senior StandingCounsel for tlre lncome Tax Department for the appellant. Perusedthe recold
2. This appeal under Section 260,4. of the Income Tax Act,1961, has heen preferred by the Revenue as the appellantagainst the order dated 11.07.2008 passed by the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'B', Flyderabad,lnI.T.A.No.209/HydI2006 for the Assessment Year 2O(t2-03.3. Central Iloard ol'Direct Taxes (CBDT) has issued Circular INo.9 of 20221 dated 17.09.2024, amending the previous CircularNo.5 of 2024 dated 15.03.2024, by further enhancing the monetarylimits for filing appeais by the Income Tax Departnrent before theIncome Tax ,\ppellate Tribunals, High Courts and Supreme Court
I
I
as a measure for reducing litigation. In paragraph 2 of the saidCircular, we find that the monetary limit fixed for filing an appealbefore the High Court is Rs.2.00 crore.before the High Court is Rs.2.00 crore.
4. In the instant appeal, tax effect is well below the monetarylimit.
5. Therefore, the appeal filed by the Deparlment is dismissed interms of the aforesaid Circular No.9 of 2024 dated 17.09.2024.However, if the appeal comes within the exception of CircularNo.5 of 2024, it would be open to the Income Tax Department toseek revival ofthe appeal. There shall be no order as to costs.
6. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shallstand closed.
Sd/. K. SRINIVASA RAOT REGISTRARECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
To,
1. The lncome Tax Appellate [Tribunal, Hyderabad 'B' Bench, ][Hyderabad]
2. The Commissioner of [lncome Tax (Appeals)-lV, ][Hyderabad]
3. The Deputy Commissioner [of ][Income ][Tax ][Central Circle-3, ][Hyderabad]
4. One CC Mr. J.V. Prasad, Senior Counsel [for ][lT Department[OPuC]]
5. Two CD Copies
.kam@*
HIGH COURT
DATED:10102,t2025
JUDGMENTITTA.No.238 of 2010
DISMISSING OFTHE APPEAL
,,{ar\
r1..\.J'{. [\l:]f.,ioolI+ [nPn ][ztzt]:Jr- [,l].lta OEsPArcl
I
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.