Case LawHigh Court › Itta/239/2005 Of National Mineral Develo...

Itta/239/2005 Of National Mineral Development Corporation Limited v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Basheerbagh

High Court 04 Jun 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/239/2005 Of National Mineral Development Corporation Limited v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Basheerbagh
Date of order
04 Jun 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itta/239/2005 Of National Mineral Development Corporation Limited v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Basheerbagh, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNETWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAOANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR INCOME TAX TRIBUNA L APPEAL NO: 239 OF [2005] lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 260 [of the ][lncome ][Tax Act, ][against]the order of the lncome Tax Appellate [Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ]['A', ][Hyderabad ][in]lTA,No.1035/Hyd/2003 for assessment [year ][2000-2001 ][dated ][11.07.2005 ][preferred]against the Order of the Commissioner [of ][lncome Tax Appeals-lll, ][Hyderabad, ][Appeal]No.823/DCIT 2 [(4)/CIT(A)-lll/02-03 ]dated [15.07.2003, preferred against the order of ][the]Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax [Circle-2 ][(4), ][Hyderabad ][PAN/GlR ][No.]AAACNTS25A dated 31.01.2003. Between: National Mineral Development Corporation [Limited, Khaniz Bhavan' ][10-3-311/A,]Castle Hills, Masabtank, Hyderabad-500028 ...APPELLANT/APPELLANT AND The Deputy Commissioner of lncome [Tax, Circle 2(4), Ayakar ][Bhavan,]Basheerbagh, Hyderabad-500001 ..,RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: SRl. [N. ][R. ] Counsel for the Respondent: SRI J. [V. ][PRASAD (SC FOR INCOME TAX)]The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT I To, .\ND I IO\OL' R.\BLh SI{l J [.STICE l'.\'l\OI) Kl-' \1.\ [R] LT.'l'..\. \o.239 OF 2005 JUDGMENT:[(Per ]Sri Justice M.S.Rtunachandra Rao) Learned counsel for the appellant has a filed a letter seekingwithdrawal of this appeal on the ground that the appellant wishes to availthe benefits under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.introduced by the Central Covernment. 2. ln that view ot'the matter, this appeal is clismissed as withclrau'nwith liberry to apploach this CoLrrt if there is no settlemcnt unclcr the saicl,\et. \o co st s. i. I)ending niiscellaneous petitions, it' any, shall also stantltlismissed Sd/. K.SRINIVASA JOINT REGISTRARr4\SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// 1. The lncome Tax Appellate [Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ]['A', ][Hyderabad] 2. One CC to Sri [N. ][R. Siva ][Swamy, Advocate ] ] 3. One CC to Sri J. [V. Prasad (SC FOR INCOME TAX) ][ ] 4. Two CD Copies 5. One Spare CopY Spare CopYY gbr \ HIGH COURT DATED: 0410612021 .141HI:Sd.'(\5JUDGMENTo(.)2 3 [jili'l ][2021]ITTA.No.239 of [2005]o D!SMISSING THE APPEALAS WITHDRAWNL
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan