Itta/241/2014 Of K.v.v.prasad v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
03 Apr 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/241/2014 Of K.v.v.prasad v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
03 Apr 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/241/2014 Of K.v.v.prasad v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A.No.241 of 2014
Date: 03-04-2014
Between:
K.V.V.Prasad
.....Appellant
AND
Income Tax Officer, Palakollu
...Respondent
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A.No.241 of 2014
JUDGMENT:(per Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta )
Mr.S.R.Ashok, learned Senior Counsel takes notice on behalf ofthe Revenue in this matter.
This appeal is sought to be preferred against the judgment andorder of the learned Tribunal dated 4[th] March 2014, by which thelearned Tribunal refused to grant stay of the recovery of the alleged taxdues, instead it granted instalments. It appears that the appeal hasbeen pending for more than two years. We are of the view that,contrary to the statutory provision, the appeal should not have beenkept pending. We do not find any element of law involved in thismatter.
We, therefore, without interfering with the impugned order, directthe learned Tribunal to dispose of the appeal, within a period of onemonth from the date of communication of this order, giving top priorityin accordance with law. In the event, for any reason, the appeal is notdisposed of within the time, the payment of instalments in terms of theorder of the learned Tribunal for the subsequent period will standdeferred, without prejudice to the rights of the appellant.
The appeal is accordingly disposed of. Miscellaneous petitionspending, if any, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.
___________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
__________________
SANJAY KUMAR,
J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.