Itta/241/2018 Of Visakhapatnam Industrial Water Supply Company Limited(Viwsco) v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
03 Jan 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/241/2018 Of Visakhapatnam Industrial Water Supply Company Limited(Viwsco) v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
03 Jan 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/241/2018 Of Visakhapatnam Industrial Water Supply Company Limited(Viwsco) v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, this Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, TI-IE THIRD DAY OF JANUARYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. SAM KOSHYANDTHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
l.T.T.A.No: 241 of 2018
Appeal Under Section 260 A of the lncome Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated24-08-2016 in l.T.A.No.1707lHydlZo13 (Assessment Yeat 2OO7 - 08) on the file ofthe Court of the lncome Tax Appellale Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench "A'Hyderabadpreferred against the order dated O2-O9-2O13 in 1.T.A.No.0394/ClT(A)-ll, Hyd/201 1-12 on the file of the Court of the Commissioner of lncome Tax ( Appeals)-ll ,Hyderabad [preferred ]against the order of the Deputy Commissioner of lncorne Tax,Circle-l5(2), Hyderabad dated 31-03-201 1 in TAN No. HYDV00914E.
Between:
Visakhapatnam lndustrial Water Supply Company Limited (VIWSCO), C/o.Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Room No.204, Tenneti Bhavan,Asilmetta Junction, Visakhapatnam - 530 002, Andhra Pradesh.
...APPELLANT
AND
The AssrstantCommissioner of lncome Tax, Circle-15(2),(TDS),Hyderabad,Room No.444,4'h Floor, 'D' Block, l-T.Towers,10-2-S, n.C.Cir'ards, Hyderabad-500 004.
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant: Mr. A.V.A. SIVA KARTIKEYA
Counsel for the Respondent: SRI K. MAMATA CHOUDARY, Sr. SC FOR lT
DEPARTMENT
The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
-r
I
1I
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSITY
AND
THE IION'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.TT'I(ARAMJI
I.T.T.A. No.241 of 2O18
WDGMENT: kter Hon'ble Srt Jltsti(E [p.sAM ]KoSHy)
Mr.A.V.A.Siva Kartikeya, learned counsel for the appellant
seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the instant appeal.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, this Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. No
order as to costs.
4Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall
stand closed.
SD/. C.V.MALLIKARJUNA [ ]JOINT REGISTRAR
[ ]REGISTRAR*-ko.* [/]REGISTRAR*-ko.* [/]
//TRUE SECTIO
To,1. The [lncome Tax ][Appellate Tribunal, ][Hyderabad Bench "A" Hyderabad]
12. i'n. Co.rittioner'of [lncome Tax ( ][Appeals)-ll ]' [Hyderabad]3. in" O"prty [Commissioner ][of ][lncome ][Tax' Circle-15(2)' ][Hyderabad']
4. o;;_c-ii"'Mr. [A.V.A. ][slvA ][KARTIKEYA Advocate ][[oPUCl]5. o;; aa [to ][sRl ][K. MAMATA ][cHouDARY, sr. ] [FoR ][lr]DEPARTMENT 6. Two [CoPies]
kamNS s
HIGH COURT
DATED:0310112024
JUDGMENTITTA.No.241 of 2018
THIS APPEAL ISDISMISSEDAS WITHDRAWN
@*t*€[o]g\q
1 16.oq()o2I JAli 20242(-,.l:,'*DE'gPalCrr(--
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.