Itta/24/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax -Ii v. M/S. Ravi Shankar Real Estates
High Court
19 Jun 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/24/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax -Ii v. M/S. Ravi Shankar Real Estates
Date of order
19 Jun 2013
Assessment year(s)
1999-2000
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/24/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax -Ii v. M/S. Ravi Shankar Real Estates, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRAPRADESH AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNETWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICESRI KALYAN JYOTI SEN GUPTA
AND
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI
I.T.T.A. No.24 OF 2013
Between:
Commissioner of Income Tax-II,Hyderabad.
..... Appellant
AND
M/s. Ravi Shanker Real Estates,8-3-903/F, Nagarjuna Nagar,Ameerpet, Hyderabad.
.....Respondent
The Court made the following :
JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri K.J. Sengupta)
This appeal is filed against the order of the Income
Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench dated14.3.2012 in relation to the assessment year 1999-2000and 2000-2001.
Having heard the learned counsel for the appellantand after going through the impugned judgment, we are ofthe view that the Tribunal has not decided anything elserather set aside the order and remanded the matter forfresh hearing.
We do not find any substantial question of lawinvolved in the matter. Accordingly the appeal isdismissed. No costs.
_______________________
Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, CJ.
June 19, 2013MAS
__________
G.Rohini, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.