Itta/244/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Iv v. Orient Longman Pvt. Ltd
High Court
17 Jul 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/244/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Iv v. Orient Longman Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
17 Jul 2012
Assessment year(s)
2001-02
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/244/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Iv v. Orient Longman Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly,the appeal is dismissed at the stage of admission. ___________________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J ___________________________ RAO, J17.07.2012.KRB.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAMANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
I.T.T.A.No. 244 of 2012.
ORDER: (Per Goda Raghuram, J)
This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 bythe Revenue is directed against the orders of the Income Tax AppellateTribunal, Hyderabad Bench in ITAT.No. 1243/H/2004, dt. 29.5.2009pertaining to the assessment year 2001-02. The Commissioner of IncomeTax (Appeals)-III, Hyderabad by the order dt. 30.9.2004 as well as theTribunal, have concurrently held that the amount of Rs. 1,13,64,943/-constitute commission received by the assessee on the distribution aspectof its business and theP amount of Rs. 1,01,20,534/- represent thecommission given to the small traders on the business pertaining topublishing activity of the assessee. This concurrent finding of fact isbased on critical appraisal of the record, which does not pose anysubstantial question of law to be considered in this appeal. Accordingly,the appeal is dismissed at the stage of admission.
___________________________
GODA RAGHURAM, J
___________________________
RAO, J17.07.2012.KRB.
M.S.RAMACHANDRA
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAMANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
I.T.T.A.No. 244 of 2012.
ORDER: (Per Goda Raghuram, J)
17.07.2012.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.