Itta/246/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Hyderabad v. M/S. Samkrg Pistons And Rings Limited
High Court
01 Feb 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/246/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Hyderabad v. M/S. Samkrg Pistons And Rings Limited
Date of order
01 Feb 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/246/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Hyderabad v. M/S. Samkrg Pistons And Rings Limited, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Therefore, the appeal filed by the reventre ['is ]dismissed inrerrns of the aforesaid Grcular No.17 of 20L9, dated 08.08.2019.However, if the appeal comes within the exception underparagr:aph 10 of Grcular No.3 of 2018, ir would be open to theIncome Tax Deparrmenr to seek revival of the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY ,THE FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYANANDTHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 246 OF 2006
lncome Tax Appeal Under Section 260 A of the lncome Tax Act, 1961aggrieved by the order dated 26-09-2006 in ITA No. 727 / HYd/ 2002 ( Asst.Year 1999-2000) on the file of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, HyderabadBench - B, Hyderabad preferred against the order of the Commissioner oflncome Tax ( Appeals ) lV, Hyderabad dated 29-09-2003 in Appeal No. 176lDC-3 (1) (ClT (A) - lV / 2003 -04 preferred against the order of the JointCommissioner of lncome Tax ( Assts.) Special Range - 4 , Hyderabad dated30-03-2001 in PAN / GIR No. S-42.
Between:
The Commissioner Of lncome Tax- lll , Hyderabad. AND
...APPELLANT
M/S. Samkrg Pistons And Rings Limited, 2O1, Divya Sakthi Complex, Ameerpet,Hyderabad. 500038. ...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant: SRl. J.V. PRASAD, Sc for l.T. Department
Counsel for the Respondent: SRI B. ADINARAYANA RAO ( not appeared )
The Court delivered the following: Judgment
THE HON'BLE THE CHTEF JUSTICE AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE [N.TUKARAMJI]I.T.T.A.No.246 of [2006]
fUDGL4ENT: [()er ][il,e ][IIon'bh ][rhe ][Chief ]Jasti,v [Uiiat ][Bhryan)]
Fleard I\iIr. J.V.Prasad, [leamed ][Standing ][C-ounsel, ][Income Tax]Depanment appearing [for ][the ][appellant.]
2. This appeal under [Section 260A ][of ][the ][Income ][Tax]Act, 196l has been [preferred ][by ][the ][revenue ][as ][the ][aPPellant]against the order [dated ][26.09.2005 ]Passed [by ][the Income ][Tax]Appellate Tribunal, [Hyderabad ][Bench ]['8" ][Hyderabad, ][in ][I.T.A]No.727 /Hyd/2002 [for ][the ][assessment ]Trear [L999-2000.]
3. IVIr. J.V.Prasad, leamed [Standing ][Counsel fairly ][submia ][that]tar effect in this appeal [is ][below ][the ][monetary ][limit for ][filing]appeal.
4. Gntml Board of [Direct ][Taxes ][(CBDT) ][has issued ][Grcular]No.17 of ZOtg,dated 08.08.2019, [amending ][the ][previous ][Grcular]No.3 of 2018, dated [LL.O7.2Ot8, ][by ][funher ][enhancing ][the ][monetary]limits for filing appeals by the Income [Tax Department ][before the]
I,,/
I
Incotne 1ax Appellate f ribunals, F[gh Courts and Supreme C-ourt
as a measure for reducing litigation. In paragraph 2 of the saidcircular we find that the monerary limit fixed for filing an appealbefore the F[gh C.ourt is Rs.1.00 crore.
5. Therefore, the appeal filed by the reventre ['is ]dismissed inrerrns of the aforesaid Grcular No.17 of 20L9, dated 08.08.2019.However, if the appeal comes within the exception underparagr:aph 10 of Grcular No.3 of 2018, ir would be open to theIncome Tax Deparrmenr to seek revival of the appeal.
Miscellaneous applications pending, lf any, shall stand closed.However, there shall be no order as to costs.However, there shall be no order as to costs.
Sd/. M VIJAYA JOINT REGISTRARR
/TRUE COPY//
To
1. The tncome [Tax ][Appellate ][Tribunal, ][Hyd-erabad ][Bench ][- ][B, ][Hyderabad]
2. The commissioner [of ][tncome Tax ][( ][Appeals ][) ][lv, ][Hyderabad]
3. The Joint [Commissioner ][of ][tncome ][Tax ][( ][Assts.) ][Special ][Range ][- ][4,]
Hyderabad
4. One CC to SRl. [J.V. PRASAD, SC ] [I.T. DEPARTMENT ][ ]
5. one CC to SRl. [B. ] [RAo, ][Advocate ][[oPUc]]
6. Two CD CoPies
kul\}-
pr
HIGH COURT
DATED:0110212023
JUDGMENT
ITTA.No.246 of 2006
DISMISSING THE ITTAWITHOUT COSTS{n
"{6'r,. [rl;lA][ 't';:])1 5 [HI\fl ][ll:l](.)t' .]l.:.;, 111-; : ''. . '
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.