Case LawHigh Court › Itta/247/2016 Of M/S Modi Shelters (P) L...

Itta/247/2016 Of M/S Modi Shelters (P) Ltd v. Income Tax Officer

High Court 16 Feb 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/247/2016 Of M/S Modi Shelters (P) Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
16 Feb 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itta/247/2016 Of M/S Modi Shelters (P) Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Granting [libert-v ][as sought ][for' this ][appeal ][is ][dismissed] as withdrawn'No costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTIGE [M,S.RAMACHANDRA RAO]ANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE [T.VINOD KUMAR] |.T.T.A. NO: 247 OF 2016 lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal under [Section ][260-4 ][of ][the ][lncome Tax ][Act, ][1961,]against the order of the Income [Tax ][Appellate Tribunal, ][Hyderabad ][Bench-A]Hyderabad, in ITA No.1567lHydl2o13 [for ][Assessment ][Year ][2010-2011 ][dated]29t0112016. Between: tr//s lr/ODl SHELTERS [(P) ]LTD., [rep. ][by Sri ][Sourabh ][tt4odi] AND lncome Tax Officer, Ward-16(1), [Hyderabad] ,..APPELLANT ..,RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant [: ][SRI CH'PUSHYAM KIRAN]l-'Counsel for the Respondents [:] The Court made the following: [JUDGI\,IENT] l= T!-1 THE [HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M'S'RAMACHANDRA ] AND THE [HON,BLE ] [T'VINOD KUMAR] I.T.[T.][A.N][o.2][47][ of][ 20][t6] JUDG NT i leer [Hontte ] [Justice ] [Ramachandra ][Rao)] Counsel [for ][appellant ][liied ][Memo ][on ][1 ][1 ][02 ][202 ][1 ][stating]that [the ][appeliant ][wishes ][to ][opt ][for Vivad ][Se ][Visu'as ][Scheme']2O2O' [and ][so ][the ][appellant ][rvishes ][|o ][u'ithdraur ][this ][Appeal]rn,ith liberty [to ][revive ][the ][Appeal ][in ][the ][errent ][the ][appellant]does [not ][get ][satisfactory ][result ][in ][the ][said ][Scheme'] 2. Granting [libert-v ][as sought ][for' this ][appeal ][is ][dismissed] as withdrawn'No costs. 3Consequently, [miscellaneous ][petitions ][pending' ][if ][any'] shail [stand ][closed']tt5'",t-f H'$U+t-tJJ\//,TRUE SECTION Toiff:t3S"*f tr ,tB[:ll?5.Ii1?:l?'A[J3;i*68'iSch-A'Hvderabad v JUDGMENTITTA.No.247 ot 2016 ITTA DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN LI 1Hea>TAzoo0 [gMAR ][2021]**
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan