Itta/249/2008 Of Thermal Systems (Hyd) Pvt Ltd, Jeedimetla, Hyd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle -3(3)
High Court
04 Feb 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/249/2008 Of Thermal Systems (Hyd) Pvt Ltd, Jeedimetla, Hyd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle -3(3)
Date of order
04 Feb 2025
Assessment year(s)
2000-2001
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/249/2008 Of Thermal Systems (Hyd) Pvt Ltd, Jeedimetla, Hyd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle -3(3), the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
I
I
134471
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERNBAD
TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
.
. THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHYANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 249 OF 2008
lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 2604 of the lncome Tax Act,1961against the Order passed in ITA No. 896/HYD/2006 for the Assessment Year2000-2001 on the file of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'B',Hyderabad preferred against the Order dated 09-08-2006 passed inF.No.26/ClT-ll/263(26y2005-06 on the file of the Commissioner of lncome TaxHyderabad - ll, Hyderabad preferred against the Order dated 31-01-2005 passed inPAN/GlR No.AAACT9825H on the file of the Assrstant Commissioner of lncome Tax,Circle - 3(3), Hyderabad.
Between:
Thermal Systems (Hyd) Pvt Ltd, Apuroopa Township, Jeedimetla, Hyderabad.
...Appellant
AND
Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle -3(3), Hyderabad
...Respondent
Counsel for the Appellant : Sri V Prabhakar( NO representation)
Counsel forthe Respondent: J V PRASAD , (Sr. Standing Counsel FORINCOME TAX DEPT.
The Court delivered the following: Judgment
.I'HE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAIVI KOSHI'
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
I.T.T.ANo.249 of 2008
.IUDGMENT: 7xr H)n hle 9i lstice P.SAM KOSHY)
Today, u.hen the matter is taken up for hearing, there is norepresentation on behalf of the appellant inspite of the matler being postedunder the caption 'for dismissal'.under the caption 'for dismissal'.
2. There \\.asi no representation on behalf of the appellant ,.)n previous
occaslons
3. In view o I the same, this Bench is Ieft with no other option but todismiss the instant appeal for want ofprosecution. Accordinglv. thc instantappeal stands c ismissed lor non-prosecution.
As a sequ,:[, miscellaneous applications pending, il- any. shall stand
closed. No ordcr as to costs.
Sd/- A.V.S.S.C;.S.M. SARMAtorNr iItECTON OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
\\To,
1. The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ['B', ]Hyderabad
2. The Commissioner of lncome Tax Hyderabad - Il, Hyderabad
3. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle - 3(3), Hyderabad
4. One CC to Sri V Prabhakar, Advocate
5. One CC to Sri J V Prasad, Sr. Standing Counsel FOR INCOA/E TAX DEPT.,
loPUCl
6. Two CD Copies
ADK
HIGH COURT
DATED:0410212025
JUDGMENTITTA.No.249 of 2008
z: - - [-'--]1l\,. [r;lAl(]??1 [tl'tr'rr][ :[lh]{ ([o]I rrr .-1nt{ [\]
DISMISSING THE ITTA FOR NON.PROSECUTIONWITHOUT COSTS
o6'r{-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.