Itta/251/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Iv v. M/S. Pokarna Limited
High Court
18 Feb 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/251/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Iv v. M/S. Pokarna Limited
Date of order
18 Feb 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/251/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Iv v. M/S. Pokarna Limited, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Therefore, the appeal filed by the Department is dismissed [in]terms of the aforesaid Circular No.9 of 2024 dated [17.09.2024.]However, if the appeal comes within the exception of CircularNo.5 of 2024, it would be open to the Income Tax Department [to]seek revival ofthe appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
I
t3447l
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHYANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 251 OF 2012
Appeal filed under Section 260(4) of the lncome-Tax Act, against the orderdated. 26-09-2008 passed in lTA.No.701/Hydl2009 for AssessmentYear 2001-2002on the file of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad Bench 'A', Hyderabadpreferred against the Order dated: 29-01-2008 passed in ITA No.267, 249 & IBB1DC-16(3yClT(A)-V/2006-07 on the file of the Commissioner of tncome Tax (Appeats)-V,Hyderabad preferred against the Order dated: 23-10-2006 passed in PAN/GIR No. /P-25 on the file of the Deputy Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Circle-16(3), Hyderabad.
Between:
The Commissioner of lncome Tax - IV, Hyderabad.
...APPELLANT
AND
M/s. Pokarna Limited, 105, Surya Towers, S.P. Road, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant: Ms. B. SAPNA REDDY, JUNTOR S.C. REp. FORSRI J.V. PRASAD, SENIOR S.C. INCOME TAX DEPT.
Counsel for the Respondent: SRI CH. PUSHYAM KIRAN
The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
II
II
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE [P.SAM ] ANDTHE HONOT]RABLE SRIJUSTICE NANDIKONDA
ITTA No.251 OF 2012
JUDGMENI'(per Hon'ble Sri Justice P.Sam Koshy)
I{eard Ms. B.Sapna Reddy, [leamed ][Junior ][Standing]Counsel representing Mr. J.V.Prasad, [learned ][Senior ][Standing]Counsel for the Income Tax [Department ][for ][the appellant. ][Perused]the record.
2. This appeal under Section 260,{ of [the ][Income ][Tax ][Act,]1961, has been preferred by the Revenue [as ][the ][appellant]against the order dated 26.09.2008 [passed ][by the ][lncome ][Tax]Appeltate Tlibunal, Hyderabad Bench 'A', [Hyderabad,]tnI.T.A.No.70lltIYD/2008 for the Assessment [Year 2001-02.]3. Central Board of Direct Taxes [(CBDT) ]has [issued ][Circular]No.9 of 2024 dated 17.09.2024, amending the [previous. ][Circular]No.5 of 2024 dated 15.03.2024, by further enhancing [the ][monetary]limits for filing appeals by the Income Tax Department before [the]Income Tax Appellate Tribunals, High Courts [and ]Supreme [Court].\
{I
I
To,
as a measure for reducing litigation. In [paragraph ]2 of [the ][said]Circular, we find that the monetary limit fixed for [filing ][an ][appeal]before the High Court is Rs.2.00 crore.
4. In the instant appeal, tax effect is well below the [monetary]limit.
5. Therefore, the appeal filed by the Department is dismissed [in]terms of the aforesaid Circular No.9 of 2024 dated [17.09.2024.]However, if the appeal comes within the exception of CircularNo.5 of 2024, it would be open to the Income Tax Department [to]seek revival ofthe appeal. There shall be no order [as ]to [costs.]
6. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shaltstand closed.
SD/.K.SRINIVASA JOINT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
ECTION OFFICER
1. The lncome Tax [Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad Bench ]['A', ][Hyderabad]
2. The Commissionei [of ][lncome Tax (Appeals)-V, ][Hyderabad]3. The Deputy Commissioner [of ][Wealth ][Tax, ][Circle-'16(3), ][Hyderabad']4. One CC to'Sri [J.V. Prasad, ][S.C. ][for lncome Tax ][ ]
5. One CC to Sri Ch. [Pushyam ][Kiran, ][Advocate ]IOPUCI
6. Two CD CopiesPlp/PSL
W
HIGH COURT
DATED: 18t)2t2O2s
JUDGMENTlTTA.No.251 of 2012
DISMISSING THE APPEAL
@v
('lo1e ApB zoz5 i\-1';\s|:!:\:))y'
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.