Case LawHigh Court › Itta/251/2018 Of Principal Commissiner O...

Itta/251/2018 Of Principal Commissiner Of Income Tax v. M/S.v Dhana Reddy And Company Shipping Services

High Court 08 Apr 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · aphc
Parties
Itta/251/2018 Of Principal Commissiner Of Income Tax v. M/S.v Dhana Reddy And Company Shipping Services
Date of order
08 Apr 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itta/251/2018 Of Principal Commissiner Of Income Tax v. M/S.v Dhana Reddy And Company Shipping Services, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

APHC010393492018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3526](Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No.251 of 2018 Between: 1. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Visakhapatnam ...Appellant AND 1. M/s.V.Dhana Reddy& Company Shipping Services, Visakhapatnam ...Respondent Counsel for the Appellant: 1.ANUP KOUSHIK KARAVADI Counsel for the Respondent: 1.G V N HARI The Court made the following JUDGMENT:(per NJS,J) The learned counsel for the appellant submits that subsequent to the filing of the appeal, the matter was resolved as the appellant availed the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2024 and paid the disputed tax. In view of the same, nothing survives for adjudication. 2. Accordingly, the appeal is closed. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA,J April 08, 2025 vasu _____________________________________ TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO,J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan