Itta/252/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. Patni Tele Com Solutions Pvt Ltd
High Court
10 Jul 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/252/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. Patni Tele Com Solutions Pvt Ltd
Date of order
10 Jul 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/252/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. Patni Tele Com Solutions Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Obviously, the Assessing Officer will actuallyfind whether actual payment is made or not.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A.No.252 of 2014
DATED:10.7.2014
Between:
The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV,Hyderabad.And
… Appellant
M/s.Patni Tele Com Solutions Pvt. Ltd,Hyderabad.
….Respondent
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A. No.252 of 2014
Judgment:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan JyotiSengupta)
We do not find any reason to interfere with the judgment andorder of the learned Tribunal as it has not decided anything else,so to say, we need to clarify on the first issue regarding paymentof provident fund. Obviously, the Assessing Officer will actuallyfind whether actual payment is made or not. Second issue isconcerned, it appears that no decision has been rendered by thelearned Tribunal. The Assessing Officer was asked to considerwhether exemption can be granted under Section 10A of theIncome Tax Act, 1961.
The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Consequently, the miscellaneous petitions, if any pending,shall also stand dismissed. No order as to costs.
__________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
_________________
SANJAY KUMAR,
J
10[th] July, 2014
kvni/va
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.