Itta/254/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Natural Vanaspathi
High Court
17 Jul 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/254/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Natural Vanaspathi
Date of order
17 Jul 2012
Assessment year(s)
1996-97
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/254/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Natural Vanaspathi, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: On the aforesaid view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed atthe stage of admission.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAMANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
ITTA No. 254 of 2012
Dated: 17-7-2012
Between:
The Commissioner of Income Tax,Central Circle, Hyderabad
And
M/s Natural Vanaspathi (formerly known asKedia Vanaspathi Ltd.),Hyderabad
…Appellant
…Respondent.
Judgment(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram)
Heard Sri J.V.Prasad, learned Senior Standing Counsel for theIncome Tax.
No question of law arises for consideration in this appeal by theRevenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench (for short‘the Tribunal’) vide its order under appeal has held, on a cogentconsideration of the evidence and the material on record that in view ofthe certificate of commissioning issued by the Tamil Nadu ElectricityBoard; invoices raised by the assessee on TNEB for sale of electricityfor the period 30-3-1996 to 31-3-1996; and advance receipts issued bythe assessee for the payment to be received from the TNEB, for theaforesaid period, not having been shown to be or even pleaded to befabricated, the conclusion is irresistible that the assessee was theowner of the generator and had also used the same during the yearunder consideration i.e., the Assessment year 1996-97.
On the aforesaid view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed atthe stage of admission. No costs.
_________________________
GODA RAGHURAM, J
17[th ]July, 2012
GRR
_______________________________
M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.