Case LawHigh Court › Itta/256/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itta/256/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Iii v. Svc Estate Private Limited

High Court 16 Apr 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/256/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Iii v. Svc Estate Private Limited
Date of order
16 Apr 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itta/256/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Iii v. Svc Estate Private Limited, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A. No.256 of 2014 DATED:16.4.2014 Between:Commissioner of Income Tax-III,Hyderabad.And … Appellant SVC Estates Pvt. Ltd.,Hyderabad. ….Respondent THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A.No.256 of 2014 Judgment:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan JyotiSengupta) We have heard Mr. B. Narasimha Sarma, learnedcounsel for the appellant and we have gone through theimpugned judgment and order of the learned Tribunal. The learned Tribunal has passed an order whilerecording a finding that the pre-condition for initiation ofpenalty proceedings are not satisfied in the case. In thatview of the matter, we do not find any infirmity or illegalityin the judgment and order of the learned Tribunal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. Consequently, the miscellaneous applications, if anypending, shall stand closed. No costs. __________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ _________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J 16[th] April, 2014PNB
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan