Itta/257/2017 Of M/S Sponge Iron India Limted, Hyderabad v. Dy Commr Of Income Tax, Hyderabad
High Court
04 Jun 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/257/2017 Of M/S Sponge Iron India Limted, Hyderabad v. Dy Commr Of Income Tax, Hyderabad
Date of order
04 Jun 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itta/257/2017 Of M/S Sponge Iron India Limted, Hyderabad v. Dy Commr Of Income Tax, Hyderabad, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY. THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNETWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE [M.S.RAMACHANDRA ] ANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE [T.VINOD KUMAR]
INCOM E TAX TRIBUNAL APPEA[L NO: ][257 ] [20'17]
(lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under [section ][260 ][of ][the ][lncome Tax ][Act, ][against the]order of the lncome [Tax ][Appellate ][Tribunal, ][Hyderabad Bench ][' ] Hyderabad in " No.4B5lHydt2016(AssessmentYear2002-03)dated.10.08.2016preferredagainst the order [of ][the ][commissioner ][of ][lncome ][Tax ][( ][Appeals ][) ][4, ][Hyderabad]dated 29-01-2016 [in Appeal No. 0580 /DCIT, Cir.3 (2) ] [14-15 ][/ClT ][(A) ][-4 ][/ ][Hyd ][/ ][15-16]order [of ][the ][Deputy Commissioner ][of ][lncome ][Tax ][, Circle ][- ][3 ][(2),]preferred against the dated [31-10-2006 ][in ][PAN/GlR ][No ][ /S-066 ][)]Hyderabad
Between:
I\,4/ssoonqelronlndiaLimted,Hyderabad,[Merg.e^dwithNlvlDCLimited]rep'byitsiiiilJ;iH;,;;;M; [D";iil".,;' ][s ][iiiin-i[il'i''1i'' ]["r ][os-st ][1 ][/A"'Khanii ]":APPELLANT[Bhavan" ][ca ][stre]Hills, Maiab [Tank, ][Hyderabio ][- ][soo"oza ]AND
DeoutvcommissioneroflncomeTax,circle.3(2),lncomeTaxTowers'A'CGuardsEi'!r""''sriiiii'.li;;i; [t";;i;, ][n ][C'cuaros' ][Hv<ierabad ][- ][500 ][004]
."RESPONDENT
Counsel [for the Appellant: ] [S' DWARAKANATH]
Counsel [for the ][Respondent: ]
The Court [delivered ][the ][following: ][Judgment]
II ON O URAB LE SRI J USTICE M.S. ITAMAC I{AN I)RA IL,\O
AND
HONOURABI,E SRI JUSTICE I"VINOD KUMAR
I.T.T.A. No.257 0F 2017
JUDGMENT i (Per Sri Jkstice M.S.Ramactuntlro Rao)
Learned counsel for the appellant has a filed a letter seekingwithdrawal of this appeal on the ground that the appellant wishes to availthe benefits under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020,introduced by the Central Govemment.
2. In that view of the matter, this appeal is dismisserl as withdrarvnwith liberty to approach this Court if there is no settlement under the saidAct. No costs.
3. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also standdismissed.
SD/. M, SANTHI VARDHANIJOINT REGISTRAR\U---
//TRUE COPY'
sEcTtoN oFF|CER
To
1. The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench'Bl Hyderabad.The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench'Bl Hyderabad.
2, The Commissioner of lncome Tax ( Appeals ) 4, 2"d Floor Annexe, AayakarBhavan, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad 5 OO 004.Bhavan, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad 5 OO 004.
3. The Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle -3 (2), Hyderabad.
4. One CC to Sri. S.Dwarakanath, Advocate
5. Two CD Copies
6. One Spare Copy
KUL
TPt-_-
HIGH
DATED: [0410612021]
JUDGMENTlTTA.No.257 of 2017
DISMISSING THE ITTA.AS WITHDRAWN.AS WITHDRAWN.
,i[g ][s ][f ][,\Ts].\,^\rA\.t).)2 [g ][stP?8?1].f,'J*.//r -,11a{C
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.