Itta/26/2019 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax v. L Ravindra Rao
High Court
08 Apr 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · aphc
Parties
Itta/26/2019 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax v. L Ravindra Rao
Date of order
08 Apr 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/26/2019 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax v. L Ravindra Rao, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Recording the said submission, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
APHC010041972019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3526](Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAOINCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No.26 OF 2019
Between:
1. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Vijayawada
...Appellant
AND
1. L Ravindra Rao, 64-9-2, SBH Complex, Patamatalanka, Vijayawada
...Respondent
Counsel for the Appellant:
1.Y N VIVEKANANDA
Counsel for the Respondent:
1.
The Court made the following JUDGMENT:(per NJS,J)
At the time of considering the matter,Mr.Y.N.Vivekananda, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department appearing for the appellant along with Mr.Vamsi Krishna Bodapati, learned Junior Standing Counsel states that in view of the monetary limits, as per CBIC Circular No.5 of 2024, the Department instructed withdrawal of the
appeal. The Certificate addressed by the Income Tax Officer, Ward–2(1), Vijayawada, in this regard, is placed on record.
2. Recording the said submission, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________
NINALA JAYASURYA,J
April 08, 2025 vasu
____________________________
TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO,J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue