Case LawHigh Court › Itta/264/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itta/264/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri S. Nanda Gopal Reddy

High Court 12 Jul 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/264/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri S. Nanda Gopal Reddy
Date of order
12 Jul 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/264/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri S. Nanda Gopal Reddy, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed. ______________________ K.J.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH,HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAAND THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI I.T.T.A. No. 264 of 2013 DATE: 12.07.2013 Between: The Commissioner of Income TaxGuntur. … Appellant And Sri S. Nanda Gopal ReddyNellore District. … Respondent This court made the following: THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI I.T.T.A. No. 264 of 2013 JUDGMENT:(Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant and gone throughthe impugned judgment and order of the learned Tribunal. By the impugned judgment and order the Tribunal upheld the decisionof the Commissioner of Income Tax, who set aside the penalty proceedingsholding that no accurate information was supplied, which warrants penaltyunder Section 271(1)(c). The Tribunal has accepted this fact finding exceptin case of the creditor Sri P. Audisesha Reddy, as information in relation tothe alleged credit of the said person is incorrect and inaccurate. In view of the above fact finding, we do not find any reason to interferewith the impugned judgment and order of the Tribunal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. ______________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ _______________ G. ROHINI, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan