Itta/265/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv, Hyderabad v. Prasad Homes (P) Ltd
High Court
20 Dec 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/265/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv, Hyderabad v. Prasad Homes (P) Ltd
Date of order
20 Dec 2024
Assessment year(s)
2004-05
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/265/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv, Hyderabad v. Prasad Homes (P) Ltd, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in termsof the liberty as prayed for.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHEANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 265 OF 2012
Appeal filed under Section 260-4 of the lncome Tax Act, ['1961 ]against theOrder dated 22.O8.2008 passed in I.T.A.No. 770lHlOB for Assessment year 2004-05on the file of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'B', Hyderabadpreferred against the Order dated 27.02.2008 passed in ITA No. 295lDC-16(3yClT(A)-Vl2006-07 on the file of the Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals) -V, Hyderabad for Assessment Year 2004-05, preferred against the AssessmentOrder dated 08.12.2006 passed in PAN/GIR No. AACCP7l60PlP-244 on the fite ofthe Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle - 16(3), Hyderabad.
Between:
The Commissioner of lncome Tax-lV, Hyderabad
...Appellant
AND
Prasad Homes (P) Ltd., 30'1, Surabhi Lotus Apartments, Ameerpet, Hyderabad.
...Respondent
Counsel for the Appellant : Mr. J.V. Prasad Senior Standing counsel forlncome Tax Department
Counsel for the Respondent : -
The Court delivered the following:
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENTVAS RAO
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No.265 of 2Ol2
JUDGMENT: Per the Hon'bLe the Chief Justice Alok Aradhe)
Mr. J.V.Prasad, learned Senior Standing Counsei for Income TaxDepartment for the appellant
2.
Learned Senior Standing Counsel for the appellant seeks
leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal in the tight of the CircularNo.O9 12024, date(1 17.09.2024, with the liberty to rerrive the same incase the subject .Tratter of the appeal falls in any of the exceptionscase the subject .Tratter of the appeal falls in any of the exceptionsprovided in the Cir-cular No.Sl2024 dated 15.03.2024.
3.
3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in termsof the liberty as prayed for.
Miscellaleou s applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
However, there shr:ll be no order as to costs.
A.V.S.S.C.S.M. SARMAJOINT REGISTRAR{ ,--\-
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
'1 The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ,B',Hyderabad.Hyderabad.
Hyderabad.2 The Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals) - V, Hyderabad3. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle - i6(3), Hyderabad4. One CC to lVlr J.V. Prasad Senior standing counsel for lncome TaxDepartment [OpUC]3. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle - i6(3), Hyderabad4. One CC to lVlr J.V. Prasad Senior standing counsel for lncome TaxDepartment [OpUC]5. Two CD Copies
L/gh
HIGH COURT
DATED:2011212024
JUDGMENTITTA.No.265 [of ][201it']
APPEAL IS DISMISSED
,.4 j f r1S 5y,1l, )r [,,)]0 I iAil t0fr:It{+r'rEo[*]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.