Case LawHigh Court › Itta/266/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itta/266/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Hyderabad v. M/S. Hyderabad House Pvt.ltd

High Court 12 Jul 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/266/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Hyderabad v. M/S. Hyderabad House Pvt.ltd
Date of order
12 Jul 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/266/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Hyderabad v. M/S. Hyderabad House Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed. ______________________ Date: 12.07.2013ES _______________ G.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH,HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAAND THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI I.T.T.A. No. 266 of 2013 DATE: 12.07.2013 Between: The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central),Hyderabad. … Appellant And M/s. Hyderabad House Pvt., Ltd.,Hyderabad. … Respondent This court made the following: THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI I.T.T.A. No. 266 of 2013 JUDGMENT:(Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) This appeal is preferred and sought to be admitted on the following suggested question of law. “Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal iscorrect in law in holding that the computation of undisclosed income u/s.153A/153C of the Act should be confined only to the material found during thecourse of search proceedings?” In our opinion, the aforesaid question is very vague, as the undisclosedincome shall be computed always on the basis of the material, which is foundduring the course of search. No material, which was disclosed at the time ofregular assessment or block assessment period, can be relied on to arrive atthe undisclosed income. The learned counsel for the appellant has drawnour attention to Section 158BI of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which reads asunder: “158BI. The provisions of this chapter shall not apply where a searchis initiated under Section 132, or books of account, other documents or anyassets are requisitioned under Section 132A after the 31[st] day of May, 2003.” In this present appeal, there is no statement or averment that the searchwas initiated under Section 132 or books of account, other documents or anyassets are requisitioned under Section 132A. Therefore, there is no illegalityor infirmity in the judgment and order of the learned Tribunal warrantinginterference of this Court. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. ______________________ Date: 12.07.2013ES _______________ G. ROHINI, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan