Case Law › High Court › Itta/269/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itta/269/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-V v. M/S Progressive Constructions Ltd

High Court 12 Feb 2016 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

12 Feb 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itta/269/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-V v. M/S Progressive Constructions Ltd, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHANAndTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY I.T.T.A.M.P.No.18 of 2016IN/AND I.T.T.A.No.269 of 2015 COMMON ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan) Sri J.V.Prasad, learned counsel for the appellant, submitsI.T.T.A.M.P.No.18 of 2016 is filed seeking permission to withdraw the mainappeal as the tax effect involved in this matter is below the monetary limitsprescribed by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, vide Circular No.21 of2015, dated 10.12.2015. Permission is accorded. I.T.T.A.M.P.No.18 of 2016 is disposed ofaccordingly. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Miscellaneous Petitionspending, if any, shall stand disposed of. There shall be no order as tocosts. ______________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J 12[th] February, 2016.Tsy __________________________________ M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.